SuperCub@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 month agoReminder—sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square122fedilinkarrow-up11.65Karrow-down126cross-posted to: lemmydirectory@lemmy.dbzer0.comfilosofiacritica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
arrow-up11.62Karrow-down1imageReminder—sh.itjust.worksSuperCub@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 month agomessage-square122fedilinkcross-posted to: lemmydirectory@lemmy.dbzer0.comfilosofiacritica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-squarekrolden@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-21 month agoYes. Especially if the alternative is profiting billionaires. Also theres plenty of smaller-ish venues not owned by live nation
minus-squarebane_killgrind@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoIt would be irresponsible to play at a venue that can’t handle the crowd needs that the artist would attract. Breaking up Live Nation is the solution. Expecting musicians to put touring on hold while that happens isn’t reasonable.
Yes. Especially if the alternative is profiting billionaires.
Also theres plenty of smaller-ish venues not owned by live nation
It would be irresponsible to play at a venue that can’t handle the crowd needs that the artist would attract.
Breaking up Live Nation is the solution. Expecting musicians to put touring on hold while that happens isn’t reasonable.