• CMLVI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s not even just about the salute. Using Twitter links, especially in the sports subreddits, has been a pain point for years and years. Unless you have an account, you can’t see what was said. If you do have an account, you can’t see the original tweet in response. When highlights are posted, the video player is trash. There is always a karma race to post the info first. Updated information has to become a new thread because you can’t edit the old tweet. Deleted tweets lead to dead threads. The experience has been shitty for years, this is just the last push it took to try to break out. ESPN has started making it’s analysts info and breaking stories available on their platform through some kind of system on ESPN? I got notifications about it on Tuesday. So the functionality isn’t really being lost; information is still coming out as normal, it just isn’t from a shitty platform (completely separate from current events).

    • john89@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      All fantastic reasons to discourage posting twitter links, but I stand by my assertion that this kind of censorship is not a good thing.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “I agree with your argument, but I’m going to be contrarian anyways cause fuck it”

        • john89@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Not really.

          It’d be more accurate to say you guys are clamoring to fit in.

            • john89@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              You guys, you people, etc. The people getting mad at me because I dared to stand up for free speech when it’s something unpopular being said.

              I lump them all into one big group because they’re incapable of autonomous thought, just like you.

              Enjoy your block, btw.

      • CMLVI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I wouldn’t call that censorship. No spread of information is being restricted anymore so than what Twitter already restricts. Unless you are connected to your Twitter account already, it cannot be seen. The information can and is readily found elsewhere. Is restricting of linking to a platform (who itself is restrictive in who can see the information) censorship alone, ignoring the content?

        • john89@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No, it’s textbook censorship.

          Just because it’s censoring something you want censored doesn’t mean it’s not censorship.

          It’s sad this has to be spelled out for so many of you, but I really don’t expect more considering the world you’re growing up in.