• Boe6@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah but if this is what it takes to get a recipe search result that isnt 50 ads and a 5 page essay before the actual content, I ain’t going to complain.

    • ffmike@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is why I use DuckDuckGo instead of Google, and Firefox with a few selected extensions that ensure I almost never see an ad. I would be shocked if Google enabled any long-term ad-free experience.

      • wet_lettuce@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        As crappy as googles results seem to have gotten over the last year, anytime I try to set my browser default search to anything else, I end up irritated and going back to Google for 50% of my searches(maybe even more ). Bing is fairly decent, but if the goal is privacy…

        The alternative search engines just always lack the context–ehich presumably google has from me by pilfering my information for the last 2 decades.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They’re talking about the ads on the site, not on Google.

        Basically saying if this helps them find sites that focus on content and not extracting profit, they won’t have an issue with it.

        • ffmike@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, I get it. Effectively block ads and javascript and it doesn’t much matter what a site wants to do. I skip the few that have actually effective paywalls (as opposed to just putting a div over content on the page - as far as I’m concerned, if it’s downloaded to my computer, I am allowed to read it). Of course, the sites that load up on ads tend to be pretty low-quality content anyhow.