• fishos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The experiment was to move beyond external parties. They were not able to do so and returned to using external parties. Ergo “the experiment failed”.

    • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They were forced to do it by the IMF and US

      Why do you think that they’d care about it if it was failing?

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        So they experimented with resisting the US and IMF and it was not successful.

        We call that an experimental failure.

        You really don’t get it. “Blockchain” was not the experiment. “Utilizing blockchain in the global economy” was the experiment.

        And it failed.

          • fishos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Again, for the people in the back:

            The experiment was whether or not they could be independent monetarily. Not whether or not blockchain works. But whether, in actual practice, if it could provide the monetary independence some people claim it has the power to do.

            Outside influences were strong enough to overwhelm Bitcoin adoption and it succumbed to those outside influences. As an experiment seeking to test whether or not Bitcoin could resist these influences it failed.

            This is how experimentation works. Now you can tweak your experiment and try again, but acting like failing at the exact thing you were trying to accomplish is somehow not an experimental failure is just delusional.