The prosecutor has a history of agreeing to leniency in plea deals then going for incredibly harsh penalties after.
When I asked for details, you listed one case. She didn’t go for incredibly harsh penalties in the case. She recommended what she agreed to recommend, but also criticized the defendant mercilessly in a statement, so much that the judge decided to go with something like 20% more than the recommended sentence. If there’s only that one example (which, I’m going to assume after asking several times and getting subject-changes, is what there is), and it doesn’t actually match what you said she “has a history of” in multiple plea deals, that’s an inaccurate presentation of what happened to match your narrative. I.e. a lie. You might not like hearing that’s what it is, and maybe I am unaware of more of the history that you just don’t want to give me, but that’s what it looks like to me.
You said:
When I asked for details, you listed one case. She didn’t go for incredibly harsh penalties in the case. She recommended what she agreed to recommend, but also criticized the defendant mercilessly in a statement, so much that the judge decided to go with something like 20% more than the recommended sentence. If there’s only that one example (which, I’m going to assume after asking several times and getting subject-changes, is what there is), and it doesn’t actually match what you said she “has a history of” in multiple plea deals, that’s an inaccurate presentation of what happened to match your narrative. I.e. a lie. You might not like hearing that’s what it is, and maybe I am unaware of more of the history that you just don’t want to give me, but that’s what it looks like to me.
You called me a liar, and at no point did I lie.
I dont have any interest in the kind of person that you are.
Goodbye.