Summary

JD Vance faced backlash for claiming judges cannot limit executive power after a federal court blocked Elon Muskā€™s DOGE from accessing Treasury payment systems.

Critics, including Rep. Daniel Goldman and DNC Vice Chair David Hogg, reminded Vance of the constitutional separation of powers.

Musk called for the judgeā€™s impeachment, labeling him ā€œcorrupt.ā€

Legal experts warned Vanceā€™s stance suggests the administration may ignore unfavorable court rulings, raising concerns about respect for judicial oversight and the rule of law.

  • mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    1 day ago

    Akshully, I think you need to read the case law, Marbury v. Madison, on that one, and not just the Constitution.

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      1 day ago

      Umā€¦to be fair, ā€œcase lawā€ doesnā€™t override the Constitution. The Supreme Court gave themselves power not explicitly granted to them in the Constitution, and the rest of the country has just been going along with it since.

      It is somewhat hypocritical to say that Trump canā€™t just grant himself new powers out of thin air, then use a case where the Supreme Court just granted itself new powers out of thin air as justification.