I purchased a system76 Thelio Mira Elite With a AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. I kinda regret not going with Nvidia at this point but it is what it is. I primarily use it as a developer workstation, but want to play games on it as well so I can be rid of my windows box.

I didn’t expect it to be able to play the latest and greatest games but I did expect it to be able to play older titles reasonably well. Games launch from steam and seem to work, but I’m getting between 0 and 10 fps on the title screen of Kerbal Space Program. Other games are similarly functional but poorly performing.

Where do I start? How can I ensure my GPU is being leveraged? Is this as good as it gets?

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Games launch from steam and seem to work, but I’m getting between 0 and 10 fps on the title screen of Kerbal Space Program.

    Something is definitely off on your system. I’ve a 7900 XTX (the slightly-higher-end version of that card), and while I don’t have the box in front of me, it definitely runs at at least reasonable (60fps+) rates at 2560x1440 on KSP. Might do well above that, dunno. It’s definitely not herky-jerky to the level you’re seeing, though.

    Are you using Wayland or Xorg?

    If you run radeontop (in Debian trixie, package radeontop) it should tell you various load characteristics. There isn’t a GPU-agnostic utility to do this, unless things have changed since last I’ve looked – Nvidia and AMD both have their own utilities.

    I kinda regret not going with Nvidia at this point

    Unless you’re aiming for AI stuff, where there are some significant benefits, like a large userbase and support for transformers, I’d probably recommend AMD for Linux use.

    EDIT:

    If you run glxinfo on either Xorg (or Wayland, since the emulation layer will handle it), package mesa-utils on Debian trixie, it’ll tell you what OpenGL is trying to use. If you’re using hardware-accelerated stuff, you’ll get something like this:

    Vendor: AMD (0x1002)
    Device: AMD Radeon Graphics (radeonsi, gfx1103_r1, LLVM 19.1.4, DRM 3.59, 6.12.11-amd64) (0x1900)
    
    OpenGL renderer string: AMD Radeon Graphics (radeonsi, gfx1103_r1, LLVM 19.1.4, DRM 3.59, 6.12.11-amd64)
    

    That’s been the quick-thumb-in-the-wind test to know whether hardware 3d acceleration is running since just about forever. KSP probably doesn’t actually use OpenGL – I’d guess that it’s probably using DirectX going through some emulation layer in Proton to Vulkan – but if you’ve got something wonky like no usable 3D driver support for your GPU, that’ll show it up.

    EDIT2: There’s also vulkaninfo in (package vulkan-tools in Debian trixie). It’ll give you something like:

    GPU id : 0 (AMD Radeon Graphics (RADV GFX1103_R1)):
    

    EDIT3: If you’re using Xorg and that doesn’t show hardware acceleration in use, then the next thing that I’d probably look at is /var/log/Xorg.0.log to see what Xorg is saying regarding your GPU. I don’t know much about diagnosing Wayland issues, as I’ve not been using it for all that long. The kernel log may also have interesting messages information (as root, journalctl -kb or dmesg) if the problem is at the kernel level.

    • zamithal@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      glxinfo | grep Vendor Vendor: Mesa (0xffffffff)

      glxinfo | grep Device Device: llvmpipe (LLVM 17.0.6, 256 bits) (0xffffffff)

      glxinfo | grep “OpenGL rend” OpenGL renderer string: llvmpipe (LLVM 17.0.6, 256 bits)

      Let me know if that’s not right. glxinfo dumps a lot of text but those are the only hits for your comment.

      When I launch radeontop it prints this before launching, and then the output suggests it isn’t working:

      Unknown Radeon card. <= R500 won’t work, new cards might.

      All stats sit at 0.00% except for Memory Clock @ 9%.

      EDIT:

      xorg, not wayland

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        llvmpipe

        Yeah, so it’s not using hardware acceleration then – your (poor) CPU has been trying to do all this in software emulation. I updated my comment above – take a look in Xorg.0.log if you’re on Xorg. My first guess is that you most-likely need newer drivers.

        I know that these are new enough for the 7900 XTX; that’s current for Debian trixie, just to provide a known-good point in terms of driver version.

        $ dpkg -l|grep radeon
        ii  libdrm-radeon1:amd64                                2.4.123-1                                 amd64        Userspace interface to radeon-specific kernel DRM services -- runtime
        ii  libdrm-radeon1:i386                                 2.4.123-1                                 i386         Userspace interface to radeon-specific kernel DRM services -- runtime
        ii  radeontop                                           1.4-2                                     amd64        Utility to show Radeon GPU utilization
        ii  xserver-xorg-video-radeon                           1:22.0.0-1                                amd64        X.Org X server -- AMD/ATI Radeon display driver
        

        EDIT: You don’t say what distro you’re using. If you’re using Debian stable – I think I was when I first got my 7900 XTX, and IIRC they didn’t have driver support in at that point, though that was a while back now – you might check whether you have the backports repository present.

        EDIT2: The first results for my search as to minimum supported version, though I wouldn’t take this as authoritative:

        https://old.reddit.com/r/debian/comments/1301rph/radeon_7900_support/

        Afaik 7900 needs preferably kernel 6.2+ and Mesa 23+.

        EDIT3: Sorry, you did say which OS you were using – PopOS.

        • zamithal@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          dpkg -l|grep radeon

          ii  libdrm-amdgpu-radeon1:amd64             1:2.4.120.60103-1787201.22.04                                amd64        Userspace interface to radeon-specific kernel DRM services -- runtime
          ii  libdrm-radeon1:amd64                    2.4.120-1pop1~1706792268~22.04~bfb54ee                       amd64        Userspace interface to radeon-specific kernel DRM services -- runtime
          ii  libdrm-radeon1:i386                     2.4.120-1pop1~1706792268~22.04~bfb54ee                       i386         Userspace interface to radeon-specific kernel DRM services -- runtime
          ii  radeontop                               1.4-1                                                        amd64        Utility to show Radeon GPU utilization
          ii  xserver-xorg-video-radeon               1:19.1.0-2ubuntu1                                            amd64        X.Org X server -- AMD/ATI Radeon display driver
          

          I don’t know exactly what i’m looking for in the xorg logs… cat /var/log/Xorg.*.log | grep “EE”

          cat /var/log/Xorg.*.log | grep “WW”

          [  5068.047] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for modesetting
          [  5068.047] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for fbdev
          

          cat /var/log/Xorg.*.log | grep “gpu”

          [  5067.696] (II) Applying OutputClass "AMDgpu" to /dev/dri/card1
          [  5067.696] 	loading driver: amdgpu
          [  5067.696] (==) Matched amdgpu as autoconfigured driver 0
          [  5067.696] (II) LoadModule: "amdgpu"
          [  5067.696] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amdgpu_drv.so
          [  5067.696] (II) Module amdgpu: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
          	All GPUs supported by the amdgpu kernel driver
          

          sudo journalctl -kb | grep gpu

          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: [drm] amdgpu kernel modesetting enabled.
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu: Virtual CRAT table created for CPU
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu: Topology: Add CPU node
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: enabling device (0006 -> 0007)
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: Fetched VBIOS from VFCT
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu: ATOM BIOS: 113-APM7199-002
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: CP RS64 enable
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: [drm:jpeg_v4_0_early_init [amdgpu]] JPEG decode is enabled in VM mode
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: vgaarb: deactivate vga console
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: Trusted Memory Zone (TMZ) feature not supported
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: MEM ECC is not presented.
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: SRAM ECC is not presented.
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: VRAM: 16368M 0x0000008000000000 - 0x00000083FEFFFFFF (16368M used)
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: GART: 512M 0x00007FFF00000000 - 0x00007FFF1FFFFFFF
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: [drm] amdgpu: 16368M of VRAM memory ready
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: [drm] amdgpu: 64286M of GTT memory ready.
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: [drm] GART: num cpu pages 131072, num gpu pages 131072
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: Will use PSP to load VCN firmware
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: reserve 0x1300000 from 0x83fc000000 for PSP TMR
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: RAP: optional rap ta ucode is not available
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: SECUREDISPLAY: securedisplay ta ucode is not available
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: smu driver if version = 0x0000003d, smu fw if version = 0x00000040, smu fw program = 0, smu fw version = 0x004e7e00 (78.126.0)
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: SMU driver if version not matched
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: SMU is initialized successfully!
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: [drm:jpeg_v4_0_hw_init [amdgpu]] JPEG decode initialized successfully.
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu: HMM registered 16368MB device memory
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: kfd kfd: amdgpu: Allocated 3969056 bytes on gart
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: kfd kfd: amdgpu: Total number of KFD nodes to be created: 1
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu: Virtual CRAT table created for GPU
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu: Topology: Add dGPU node [0x744c:0x1002]
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: kfd kfd: amdgpu: added device 1002:744c
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: SE 6, SH per SE 2, CU per SH 8, active_cu_number 80
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring gfx_0.0.0 uses VM inv eng 0 on hub 0
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring comp_1.0.0 uses VM inv eng 1 on hub 0
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring comp_1.1.0 uses VM inv eng 4 on hub 0
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring comp_1.2.0 uses VM inv eng 6 on hub 0
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring comp_1.3.0 uses VM inv eng 7 on hub 0
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring comp_1.0.1 uses VM inv eng 8 on hub 0
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring comp_1.1.1 uses VM inv eng 9 on hub 0
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring comp_1.2.1 uses VM inv eng 10 on hub 0
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring comp_1.3.1 uses VM inv eng 11 on hub 0
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring sdma0 uses VM inv eng 12 on hub 0
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring sdma1 uses VM inv eng 13 on hub 0
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring vcn_unified_0 uses VM inv eng 0 on hub 8
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring vcn_unified_1 uses VM inv eng 1 on hub 8
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring jpeg_dec uses VM inv eng 4 on hub 8
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: ring mes_kiq_3.1.0 uses VM inv eng 14 on hub 0
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: Using BACO for runtime pm
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: [drm] Initialized amdgpu 3.57.0 20150101 for 0000:03:00.0 on minor 2
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: fbcon: amdgpudrmfb (fb0) is primary device
          Feb 15 08:59:51 pop-os kernel: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: [drm] fb0: amdgpudrmfb frame buffer device
          Feb 15 08:59:52 pop-os kernel: RAPL PMU: hw unit of domain pp1-gpu 2^-14 Joules
          Feb 15 08:59:52 pop-os kernel: snd_hda_intel 0000:03:00.1: bound 0000:03:00.0 (ops amdgpu_dm_audio_component_bind_ops [amdgpu])
          ...
          
        • zamithal@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          uname -r

          6.9.3-76060903-generic
          

          I think this is the mesa version?

          OpenGL version string: 4.5 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 24.1.0-devel
          

          cat /etc/os-release

          NAME="Pop!_OS"
          VERSION="22.04 LTS"
          ID=pop
          ID_LIKE="ubuntu debian"
          PRETTY_NAME="Pop!_OS 22.04 LTS"
          VERSION_ID="22.04"
          HOME_URL="https://pop.system76.com/"
          SUPPORT_URL="https://support.system76.com/"
          BUG_REPORT_URL="https://github.com/pop-os/pop/issues"
          PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://system76.com/privacy"
          VERSION_CODENAME=jammy
          UBUNTU_CODENAME=jammy
          LOGO=distributor-logo-pop-os
          
          • tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            Those are the kernel and Mesa versions, and at least assuming that the thing I linked above is correct as to minimum versions, you should be okay as to versions of those.

            And if this is the out-of-box preinstalled OS from System76, I’d think that it’d be set up out of box for hardware acceleration. Hmm.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        glxinfo | grep Vendor Vendor: Mesa (0xffffffff)

        Yep, you’re using software rendering and your extremely fast GPU is sitting there idle. Talk to System76 about enabling the correct driver.

        (That was obvious from the initial “0-10 FPS in KSP” symptom, of course – even my 7-year-old AMD GPU, a Vega 56, can run that game just fine, and I’m pretty sure the AMD GPU I had before that could too.)

      • zamithal@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        vulkan-tools | grep “GPU id”:

        		GPU id = 0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31))
        		GPU id = 1 (Intel(R) Graphics (RPL-S))
        		GPU id = 2 (llvmpipe (LLVM 15.0.7, 256 bits))
        		GPU id = 0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31))
        		GPU id = 1 (Intel(R) Graphics (RPL-S))
        		GPU id = 2 (llvmpipe (LLVM 15.0.7, 256 bits))
        		GPU id = 0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31))
        		GPU id = 1 (Intel(R) Graphics (RPL-S))
        		GPU id = 2 (llvmpipe (LLVM 15.0.7, 256 bits))
        		GPU id = 0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31))
        		GPU id = 1 (Intel(R) Graphics (RPL-S))
        		GPU id = 2 (llvmpipe (LLVM 15.0.7, 256 bits))
        		GPU id = 0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31))
        		GPU id = 1 (Intel(R) Graphics (RPL-S))
        		GPU id = 2 (llvmpipe (LLVM 15.0.7, 256 bits))
        		GPU id = 0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31))
        		GPU id = 1 (Intel(R) Graphics (RPL-S))
        		GPU id = 2 (llvmpipe (LLVM 15.0.7, 256 bits))
        		GPU id = 0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31))
        		GPU id = 1 (Intel(R) Graphics (RPL-S))
        		GPU id = 2 (llvmpipe (LLVM 15.0.7, 256 bits))
        GPU id : 0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31)):
        GPU id : 1 (Intel(R) Graphics (RPL-S)):
        GPU id : 2 (llvmpipe (LLVM 15.0.7, 256 bits)):
        
        

        cat /var/log/Xorg.*.log | grep amd

        [  5067.696] (II) LoadModule: "amdgpu"
        [  5067.696] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amdgpu_drv.so
        [  5067.696] (II) Module amdgpu: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
        	All GPUs supported by the amdgpu kernel driver
        
        

        cat /var/log/Xorg.*.log | grep gpu

        [  5067.696] (II) Applying OutputClass "AMDgpu" to /dev/dri/card1
        [  5067.696] 	loading driver: amdgpu
        [  5067.696] (==) Matched amdgpu as autoconfigured driver 0
        [  5067.696] (II) LoadModule: "amdgpu"
        [  5067.696] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amdgpu_drv.so
        [  5067.696] (II) Module amdgpu: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
        	All GPUs supported by the amdgpu kernel driver
        
        
        • donio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          [ 5067.696] (II) Applying OutputClass “AMDgpu” to /dev/dri/card1

          Make sure that you actually have permission to that /dev/dri/card1 device. This may be arranged by udev or “video” group membership.

          Regarding AMD vs Nvidia, unless you need CUDA you probably made the right choice. This sounds like a config issue and you’d probably be dealing with the same thing with Nvidia too.

          • zamithal@programming.devOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yeah I’m pleasantly surprised by the unanimous responses that AMD seems to be the way to go in this space. At this point I know it’s not using my GPU at all, so you are right that nvidia wouldn’t be any different

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          GPU id : 0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31)):

          That may mean that you have accelerated graphics via Vulkan. I’m familiar with glxinfo’s output, and I’m pretty sure that the fact that it’s not listing your GPU means that OpenGL apps won’t have hardware acceleration, but not sure what vulkaninfo does if it has no hardware acceleration available – I’m not certain that having the GPU listed there means that it has 3D acceleration, or whether it can list something running via software emulation.

          Hmm. This may take a bit of feeling about, as a bit of this is new territory for me too.

          When you run vkcube – which uses Vulkan – it’ll show a spinning cube and print a single line of text about the GPU used. What does it show for you?

          EDIT: Okay, apparently vkcube doesn’t do what Vulkan apps are supposed to do by default – it tries to pick a discrete GPU, so it’s probably not the best sanity test for “what is a Vulkan-using program trying to render to”.

          I’m going to assume that the fact that vulkaninfo can see the GPU means that it’s accelerated, though. If that’s true:

          • You probably have 3D acceleration at the kernel and Xorg levels.

          • Kerbal Space Program has a Linux-native binary (on Steam, this shows up as that SteamOS icon), so it’s probably not going through Proton’s DirectX emulation, and from there to Vulkan, which it would if it only had a Windows binary. It looks like it has both an OpenGL and a DirectX rendering path on Windows. Typically games like this with a Linux-native release use the OpenGL path on Linux. kagis At least as of 2021, it looks like it was indeed using only OpenGL on Linux. So if you don’t have accelerated OpenGL, then it’s presumably not going to be accelerated.

          • I don’t think that glxinfo should be showing “llvmpipe”. I’m pretty sure that that means that you don’t have accelerated OpenGL available.

          Take this with a grain of salt – I’ve not run into an actual system where Vulkan-using games are accelerated, and OpenGL games are not. This is a guess. But it’d at least vaguely fit my understanding of what you’ve provided. I’m fuzzy on the relationship between Vulkan, OpenGL, and Mesa – I don’t know what exactly it might take to create issues for OpenGL but not Vulkan.

          • tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Okay, after some poking around, I did find at least one mechanism that could possibly cause OpenGL to not be accelerated but Vulkan to be accelerated:

            https://superuser.com/questions/106056/force-software-based-opengl-rendering-on-ubuntu

            Alternately, you can set LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1, which will only affect programs started with that environment variable, not the entire system.

            I also confirmed that it produces the output that you’re seeing on my system – with that set, glxinfo returns llvmpipe, even though vulkaninfo has GPU id 0 being the Radeon card. So if you’ve got that environment variable set somewhere, that could produce the behavior you’re seeing.

            @zamithal@programming.dev, I don’t know how you could have gotten that set, but in whatever terminal you were running glxinfo and vulkaninfo, can you run set|strings|grep LIBGL and see if maybe that’s set? If it is, maybe unset LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE and then from that terminal start steam again and see if Kerbal Space Program runs fine then?

            • zamithal@programming.devOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              It doesn’t appear to be set and additionally I don’t appear to have the libgl1-mesa-swx11 package mentioned in that post.

              set|strings|grep LIBGL

              apt list | grep libgl1-mesa

              libgl1-mesa-dev/jammy 24.0.3-1pop1~1711635559~22.04~7a9f319 amd64
              libgl1-mesa-dev/jammy 24.0.3-1pop1~1711635559~22.04~7a9f319 i386
              libgl1-mesa-dri/jammy,now 24.0.3-1pop1~1711635559~22.04~7a9f319 amd64 [installed,automatic]
              libgl1-mesa-dri/jammy,now 24.0.3-1pop1~1711635559~22.04~7a9f319 i386 [installed,automatic]
              libgl1-mesa-glx/jammy-updates 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 amd64
              libgl1-mesa-glx/jammy-updates 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 i386
              

              This does remind me that while developing a webgl canvas based javascript app the other day I was forced to go into firefox’s about:config and set webgl.force-enabled = true. I should have dug deeper on that.

              • tal@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                It doesn’t appear to be set

                Ah, okay. Bit of a long shot.

                and additionally I don’t appear to have the libgl1-mesa-swx11 package mentioned in that post.

                You shouldn’t need it – that’s for software rendering.

                You might want libgl1-mesa-glx, but it sounds from that page like that was restructured prior to your distro release.

                https://askubuntu.com/questions/1517352/issues-installing-libgl1-mesa-glx

                ibgl1-mesa-glx has been a transitional package for a while and is now obsolete from Ubuntu 23.10 and onwards.

                Installing libgl1 and libglx-mesa0 instead of libgl1-mesa-glx will result in equivalent behaviour and should work on Ubuntu 18.04 and newer.

                Both libgl1:amd64 and libglx-mesa-0:amd64 are installed on my system. Are they installed on yours? If not, if they are available in your apt repo, maybe do so and see if your problems disappear?

    • unique_hemp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      nvtop also works with AMD now and is way nicer than radeontop IMO