I said what I said

Also I’m high

  • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think I figured out the main problem with sealioning specifically. Usually the person represented by the Victorian humans in that comic simply state their position, and then an argument of some type ensues- it’s rare that something correct is also too abstract to explain, especially when you have time to type it out on the internet.

    • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also generally used in contexts where both parties are choosing to engage. That’s like, the main bad thing the sea lion does in the comic, and it’s like, if you can’t eat breakfast because people are trying to debate you on the internet, maybe try putting the phone down.

      • Barabas [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Most of the time I’ve seen it used is when someone is doing something to vent, like posting “ugh men”, and then someone comes in trying to start an argument with the actually not all men schtick. And if you refuse to engage they’ll reply to entirely unrelated stuff trying to argue the same thing (which is what is implied by the breakfast scene).

        Specifically used in the same way that most people on here dunk on reddit debatebros.

        • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s the “legitimate use” I mentioned, but I don’t know I have ever actually seen it used that way in practice. It’s so easy for debatebros to misuse it to win an argument and that useage has far eclipsed the meaning you mentioned. I’m used to dismissing any and all claims of “sealioning” so saying something like “they’re refusing to disengage,” or, “they’re following me around the site” are much better because they’re not wrapped up in an ambiguous and frequently misused term. At this point, I think the “legitimate use” meaning basically only exists to justify the term.

          Search “sealioning” on Hexbear and you can find plenty of accusations towards people who are not engaging in what you described. The problem is that the sea lion does multiple things in the comic, calling out an insult (good), asking for evidence (fine), and following them around (bad), and so if the only actually bad thing is following them around, then just say that instead of the more ambiguous term - the only reason to use the more ambiguous term is to characterize someone doing the first two as doing the third, even if they’re not.

          I’ll also point out that I was given a definition previously in this thread that made zero mention of following people around.