Summary

The Pennsylvania attorney representing Luigi Mangione, charged with murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City, contends Mangione’s arrest in Altoona was unconstitutional.

Officers supposedly approached him without cause and failed to read his Miranda rights at a McDonald’s after a five-day manhunt.

Mangione has pleaded not guilty to murder and related state and federal charges, including potential death penalty eligibility.

Mangione’s New York lawyer likewise cites constitutional violations during arrest, raising the possibility that key evidence could be suppressed.

  • meco03211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Slight correction. If that arrest and search were the only means to get that evidence, then it is thrown out. If there were other legal means they could have gotten that evidence, it becomes admissible again. Cops can illegally arrest and search you. Then if they are able to show at a later point a legal route that would have caused a legal arrest and search. It’s fine.

    • Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      If that arrest and search were the only means to get that evidence, then it is thrown out.

      But we know that’s not the case. Nancy Parker, the woman who called the police to notify them of Luigi’s whereabouts, specifically said that he looked suspicious and may be the person the police were looking for. That’s a completely legitimate arrest regardless of any other factors. Because she positively identified him as a person of interest in an ongoing homicide investigation, the police had the right to detain him, and search him for as long as it takes to positively identify him–which is what led to his eventual arrest. His manifesto and gun could all be legally confiscated (because the search was legitimate) and at this point his rights have not been violated, so the evidence collected cannot be thrown out on the premise of the exclusionary rule even if his rights were indeed violated at a later time/date.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Because this is still supposed to be a nation of laws where we don’t murder you for reporting a murderer. A nation where someone can be openly killed and people must live in fear of saying anything would be manifestly unjust and might not be unjust in just the dimention you Imagine

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yeah, I don’t care, she should be a corpse and the mods here are idiotic cowards who don’t know what words mean

            It’s not just some random person who has to live in fear and we all know it, it’s a class traitor who’s entrails should be strung up for all to see and know what happens when you snitch like a bitch