• SkaveRat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    no, it’s not even technically correct. You can technically have a carbon negative footprint on the planet

    • SMITHandWESSON@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      no, it’s not even technically correct. You can technically have a carbon negative footprint on the planet

      Lol, really?

      I’m pretty sure you’re not able to contribute to global warming after death…Unless you’re a fucking necromancer!!!

      So the proper Equation would take what they would have contributed if they were alive, and you add that as savings!!!

      PS: If you’re a necromancer and you haven’t reanimated the dead environmentalist back to life, you’re just a fucking dick.🤨

      • SkaveRat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        yes, as you can actively do stuff to remove carbon from the air. you can’t do that when you’re dead