The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 22 hours agoAn ethics professor at Cambridge talks about teaching ethics in 2025lemmy.worldimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up1745arrow-down15
arrow-up1740arrow-down1imageAn ethics professor at Cambridge talks about teaching ethics in 2025lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 22 hours agomessage-square138fedilink
minus-squareSkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-28 hours agoNo, that is not the direct equivalence. The direct equivalence for 2. Would be something like “But then they insist that being naked is never acceptable and is grotesque, and anyone that disagrees is a gross pervert” That’s where the inconsistency comes from
No, that is not the direct equivalence. The direct equivalence for 2. Would be something like
“But then they insist that being naked is never acceptable and is grotesque, and anyone that disagrees is a gross pervert”
That’s where the inconsistency comes from