andioop@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · vor 1 Jahrwell that's rudeprogramming.devimagemessage-square34linkfedilinkarrow-up11.24Karrow-down13
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imagewell that's rudeprogramming.devandioop@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · vor 1 Jahrmessage-square34linkfedilink
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up57arrow-down4·vor 1 JahrAt least it seems more “scientific” than anything that Jung ever did. https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/13027/is-there-a-reasonable-scientific-backing-for-carl-jungs-type-theories
minus-squaresaimen@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·vor 1 JahrYour source does not support your claim at all. Seems like you are projecting your scientific illiteracy onto Jung.
At least it seems more “scientific” than anything that Jung ever did.
https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/13027/is-there-a-reasonable-scientific-backing-for-carl-jungs-type-theories
Your source does not support your claim at all. Seems like you are projecting your scientific illiteracy onto Jung.