L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoA lawsuit claims OpenAI stole 'massive amounts of personal data,' including medical records and information about children, to train ChatGPTwww.businessinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1127arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.partynev@lemmy.intai.tech
arrow-up1123arrow-down1external-linkA lawsuit claims OpenAI stole 'massive amounts of personal data,' including medical records and information about children, to train ChatGPTwww.businessinsider.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square38fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.partynev@lemmy.intai.tech
The lawsuit alleges OpenAI crawled the web to amass huge amounts of data without people’s permission.
minus-squaretallwookie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down7·1 year agoif it was unsecured it’s basically public. whomever put that data on a publicly accessible server is at fault
minus-squarepriapus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoThat’s not necessarily true. Even if a company makes the mistake of not securing data correctly, those that make use of this data can still be at fault. If a company leaves a server wide open, you still can’t legally steal information from it.
minus-squareFylkir@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-21 year ago If a company leaves a server wide open, you still can’t legally steal information from it. I don’t see how this is any different than if Google search included text from a page that shouldn’t be public.
if it was unsecured it’s basically public. whomever put that data on a publicly accessible server is at fault
That’s not necessarily true. Even if a company makes the mistake of not securing data correctly, those that make use of this data can still be at fault.
If a company leaves a server wide open, you still can’t legally steal information from it.
I don’t see how this is any different than if Google search included text from a page that shouldn’t be public.