• schwar2ss@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      network segregation. setting up vnets and rulesets for guests, iot or dmz and deploy them site-wide to all switches.

      • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you want or need that, you shouldn’t be looking at consumer products. I can configure wifi, ethernet and guest wlan and an additional set of public ipv4s , which is more than enough for end users. Anything more and it becomes too hard to manage and understand, and results in insecure setups. I built infrastructure for a living and I find Fritzes more than good enough for residential connections and they work extremely well, 7581 excepted, those were godawful crap.

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          We just don’t want to be limited to fritz. You might be ok with the limited options but many are not. We should not allow the fiber exception here.

          • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You should definitely not go along with that fiber exception, I have a gigabit fiber connection where I can hook up basically anything that adheres to standards and regulations, and my ISP has been a strong proponent of that too.

        • schwar2ss@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What’s your point exactly? Besides telling me I shouldn’t use AVM hardware?

          I’m not using AVM products, as they don’t fit my requirements (e.g. network segregation). Ubiquiti makes decent prosumer hardware with their Unifi line and I’m quite happy with their offerings.

          An AVM user asked for potential use cases that FritzBoxes aren’t covering and I provided one.

    • mholiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. Your range is much lower than it should be.

      2. If multiple people use the Wi-Fi at the same time the speed is lower than it should be compared to taking your total speed and dividing by users.

      3. You are missing access to some settings that you should have access to. On newer Fritzboxes you can’t even set port forwarding at all.

      • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Excuse me but this a load of. Range is just fine, as is speed -unless you’re using a 7581 vDSL model, those were crash-prone and wifi broke often. I have and had several models and that was the only one ever causing trouble. And port forwarding is still there,at least on a 7990 with the latest firmware update.

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you are happy with the range stick with it. 🤷‍♀️

          As for port forwarding it was not an option with the fritzbox provided by vodaphone to me. Maybe because it was DS-Lite stack only.

          • PDBaer@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            No that’s because vodafone puts their own firmware version on it with limited settings. If you get the same fritzbox with the default firmware from AVM then you have port forwarding.

          • vinhill@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I had a router from 1&1 where they locked down the firmware to exclude many settings. Might be a similar case with Vodafone.

          • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You said “range is much lower than it should be”, I’ve never heard that before, except - again - only for the 7581. Fritzes are generally tested as medium to good range, and very stable, so it is not just me. Are you maybe using APs with excessive transmit power settings or something similar?

            • mholiv@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Using APs with excessive transmit power does not really extend range. The client radio can only respond with such a signal.

              I use APs with proper MIMO and proper beam forming. Doing so allows for less time slicing between clients and allows for greater distance and speed per client. Take a look at the RUCKUS R560 or it’s more advanced siblings if you are interested. Even ubiquity equipment like the U6 has a proper MIMO implementation that Fritz does not.

              If people are happy with Fritz that is ok. But it’s lower range, with lower capacity, and with fewer features than many people would like. We should not be limited to consumer level Fritz products on fiber.