The justices are forced to confront the gun policy disaster that it created.

  • AnalogyAddict@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think you’re getting temporary POs confused with permanent ones.

    My ex and abuser was convicted of domestic violence charges, and currently owns a gun and has no public record of his crimes. This despite being anti gun and getting it for the sole purpose of scaring me. Proof has nothing to do with it. Courts regularly ignore proof in order to fail to protect victims. If they don’t accept criminal convictions as proof, there isn’t much they will accept. Don’t pretend this has anything to do with a need to prove that someone is a monster before taking away his deadly toys.

    For what it is worth, our kids are still fighting to heal the damage he did to them. But he has a right to a gun, so bully for him.

    • HelixDab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If he was convicted of domestic violence, then he cannot legally own a firearm, unless the conviction has been vacated or he’s been pardoned. That’s federal law. Therefore, he either wasn’t convicted of domestic violence, the courts failed to follow through with their legal obligations and report the conviction to NICS, or he acquired the firearm illegally.