@FUCKER@lemmy.worldM to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoUH OH!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square172fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down146
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1imageUH OH!lemmy.world@FUCKER@lemmy.worldM to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square172fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down5·9 months agoDuckDuckGo is just Bing.
minus-squareTheFriar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down1·9 months agoEveryone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
minus-squareIronKrill@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 months agoI assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.
minus-squareTick_Dracy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-27 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·9 months agoDDG is a search engine without its own search engine.
DuckDuckGo is just Bing.
Everyone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
I assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.
Removed by mod
DDG is a search engine without its own search engine.