On the journey to degoogle my life and wanted to ask if the community prefers OSMAnd+ or Organic Maps for driving navigation. I got OSMAnd+ but now started to hear some really good things about organic Maps. Was wondering if I should consider switching.

    • LordChaos82OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks, I just did a quick test and it seems that organic Maps is still not available for Android auto. So will probably stick with OSMAnd+ until I can get rid of my Android auto dependency. I looked at GitHub and it seems that they are working on Android auto support so hopefully it will be ready soon. Keeping fingers crossed 🤞

          • L3ft_F13ld!@social.fossware.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Tried it earlier and couldn’t get it to work. Is it a special version from the Play Store or their website that includes the Android Auto support or something?

            • LordChaos82OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You have to enable developer mode in Android auto, add OSNAnd and then disable Android Auto to have it appear as an option. The instructions are on OSMAnd website. I followed those instructions and it worked. I have the FDroid version so not sure if it’s different for the Google Play store version.

  • FlashPossum@social.fossware.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Organic Maps have a much better rendering algorithm - meaning really fast, there is no lag when you scroll the map. OSMAnd has a really huge feature set. Almost anything you image from a map app. But it’s soooo slow. I switched to Organic because I couldn’t take the slowness.

  • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Depends.

    For simple routes Organic Maps is perfect. But if you want to plan complex route (like many waypoints, road avoidance), the OSMAnd+ is better.

    Unfortunately both are tricky on complex highway exits.

  • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just downloaded both yesterday. Do these use the same maps/databases or what’s the difference?

    I noticed OM gives more detailed control about downloading smaller map bits.

  • may_pretender@feddit.ro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I didn’t use any for driving, but I can tell you that I switched to OrganicMaps from osmand+ for all other navigation. The main reasons are speed (OM feels a lost smoother and snappier), and functionality (it’s minimal, but just works very well). I had no real use for all the bells and wistles of osmand+, so OM made sense for me.

  • alicebobby
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because of its superior buildnow gg rendering technology, Organic Maps load instantly and don’t lag when you scroll over the map. OSMAnd boasts an enormous feature set. nearly everything you could imagine using a map app. It’s rather slow, though. I couldn’t stand the slowness, so I moved to Organic.

  • mikke2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    @ geometry dash lite Both Organic Maps and OsmAnd+ are navigation apps based on OpenStreetMap (OSM) data, but they have some differences in terms of features, design, and user experience.