• Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    11·
    1 year ago

    I don’t say it would be abolished, just that it could and likely would essentially be completely gutted many times over because like I said, the only thing that’s protected is the thing existing.

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      1·
      1 year ago

      I don’t say it would be abolished

      You literally just quoted me with regards to this as part of your argument. Stop shifting the goalposts.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        2·
        1 year ago

        Read my post again. I didn’t say it would be abolished, I said it would be essentially dismantled since it would be reduced to nothing.