• TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sure, but 20-40% slower? That points to something being poorly optimised.

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, that’s what happens when there’s no hardware acceleration and it fails back to software.

      • nybble41@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        They should still be using the CPU’s built-in AES hardware acceleration, yes? It seems they have good reason not to trust the SSD to handle the encryption but that doesn’t mean it has to be entirely implemented in software. CPU-accelerated AES shouldn’t be that much slower.