fettuccinecode@programming.dev to Rust@programming.dev · 1 year agoAnalyzing Data 180,000x Faster with Rustwillcrichton.netexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down17cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.partyhackernews@derp.foorust@lemmit.online
arrow-up155arrow-down1external-linkAnalyzing Data 180,000x Faster with Rustwillcrichton.netfettuccinecode@programming.dev to Rust@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.partyhackernews@derp.foorust@lemmit.online
minus-squareSigmatics@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoYeah, this one really had me scratching my head: ✓Note: there are lots of ways we could make the Python code faster, but the point of this post isn’t to compare highly-optimized Python to highly-optimized Rust. The point is to compare “standard-Jupyter-notebook” Python to highly-optimized Rust.
Yeah, this one really had me scratching my head: