A federal judge yesterday ordered the Biden administration to halt a wide range of communications with social media companies, siding with Missouri and Louisiana in a lawsuit that alleges Biden and his administration violated the First Amendment by colluding with social networks “to suppress disfavored speakers, viewpoints, and content.”

    • Advanced_Visual@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      You couldn’t know they didn’t have data if they didn’t have the ability to present it. Once censored, it’s impossible to tell what media is, that’s the point of censorship.
      You can’t know if what was censored was false information, if you don’t have the data on what was said.

      Questioning is the heart and soul of science. Doubting included.

      To censor doubt is a demand for agreement, and an intimidation of dissent.

      • snipgan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        1 year ago

        There was a time I would believe you whole heartedly.

        I despise book bans.

        I see people try to censor other people’s very existence.

        I hate China’s authoritarian laws.

        I wish to strive to allow as much free speech and liberty reasonably possible.

        Then COVID happened. Misinformation, narrative pushing, and just plain lying. My grandma died from the virus in a hospital not consistently wearing masks or even checking for it in the first place. A hospital wear fox news plays abound and nurses proudly talk about their “knowing” of what actually is happening.

        I have to ask myself, is this worth it?

        I don’t think so. A line must be drawn somewhere.

        • C4RP3_N0CT3M@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is bullshit. They were calling certain things misinformation before they themselves knew. What gives them authority to do this and who actually decides what is true? At the time many scientists, including the CDC director (who was forcibly sidelined after sharing his position), were saying we should investigate the lab leak theory, and they were all silenced as a result. Scientists were saying that they wouldn’t have suggested quarantine (including the UKs top health advisor) as the understaffed medical/health facilities would cause more death than quarantines would save, they were saying that masks had little to no impact on CORONA viruses in the past and peer-reviewed articles suggesting this were literally removed from websites; the list goes on. Meanwhile the MSM was literally spreading misinformation like the Ivermectin story or the vaccine stopping spread story. You really have to trust someone quite a bit to just go along with this while all your freedoms are diminishing.

      • effingjoe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        People posting pro horse-medicine posts on social media aren’t ever going to be doing anything close to “science”.

        And this romantic concept of “questioning is the heart and soul of science” is just a banal platitude. Rigorous testing and record keeping is the heart and soul of science. Latching on to conspiracy theories is not even tangentially related to science.

        • C4RP3_N0CT3M@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’ve got to do your homework. This has already been proven to be a false narrative set up by MSNBC and CNN (and their subsidiaries). You’re behind. Ivermectin has been prescribed to humans for decades.

          • effingjoe@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            You suspiciously left out all the context of the discussion. I can only imagine why you’d do this. Haha

            Horse dewormer was mentioned because that’s what the maga cultists were using, because (sane) doctors wouldn’t prescribe it to humans for a coronavirus.

            You agree that Ivermectin isn’t for coronavirus, right? Right?

            • C4RP3_N0CT3M@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There has been little to no research allowed that might prove otherwise, but some countries (that were denied access to the vaccine for profit reasons) seemed to have great success using it. That being said, calling it a horse dewormer within context is literally just lying. I’m actually giving them a chance when I leave out said context.

                • C4RP3_N0CT3M@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  We’re not talking about that. You keep trying to change my argument to saying that the virus leaked from a lab; I’m not supporting that. I’m saying the DIRECTOR OF THE CDC was sidelined because he believed there was enough evidence not to rule it out, which is what the narrative was at the time and WHY he was sidelined. We may never know, because the research isn’t being done.

                  • effingjoe@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Have some self respect.

                    There has been little to no research allowed that might prove otherwise, but some countries (that were denied access to the vaccine for profit reasons) seemed to have great success using it.

                    The “it” they were using is clearly horse dewormer. Not sidelined CDC directors.

                    Also, just putting this out there. You can see who upvotes and downvotes any given comment.

          • LifeInOregon@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            But not for coronaviruses. For parasites. And not in the doses that are intended for animals, but for humans. And not purchased from a farm supply store, but through a pharmacy.

          • CoCoIchibanCurry@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I find that it is often the case that people who say “do your homework/research” (wrt science/news) were the very same students who wouldn’t do their homework.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        People making claims that “injecting bleach will cure COVID,” “COVID is a hoax,” or “the vaccine contains nanobots to control us!” aren’t questioning anything. They’re making claims that are false and dangerous, leading to needless deaths. Quit trying to act like the COVID conspiracy theorists were simply asking questions in good faith rather that intentionally spreading disinformation in order to politicize a virus.

          • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well at least you can agree that it’s all disinformation. You’re right it isn’t illegal which is why nobody wound up in jail for spreading it.

            I also see you quickly abandoned your stance that it’s “simply people asking questions” rather than something much more malicious and damaging to society.

      • effingjoe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        That was the data we had at the time, yes. New data can mean new stances, and that’s okay. But notice the order of operations there; new data, then new stance. Not the other way around.