slothrop@lemmy.ca to The Trump-Epstein Files™@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agosome epstein files can be unredacted...The Trump administration is so bloody stupid they just highlighted the text in black in the pdfs, leaving all the text available underneath.www.reddit.comexternal-linkmessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up1181arrow-down10cross-posted to: antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world
arrow-up1181arrow-down1external-linksome epstein files can be unredacted...The Trump administration is so bloody stupid they just highlighted the text in black in the pdfs, leaving all the text available underneath.www.reddit.comslothrop@lemmy.ca to The Trump-Epstein Files™@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square23linkfedilinkcross-posted to: antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoKind of. The source may influence if you recognize it as the truth or trust that it is the truth, or how close to the whole truth it is. Also, the source is affecting their reputation (in some way) by providing the truth. So it matters to the source that they are the source.
minus-squareSeeMarkFly@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoThen you didn’t hear the truth.
minus-squareSeeMarkFly@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·4 months agoSo…2+2=4 is true when Albert Einstein says it but false when Adolf Hitler says it? I’m not buying that.
Kind of. The source may influence if you recognize it as the truth or trust that it is the truth, or how close to the whole truth it is.
Also, the source is affecting their reputation (in some way) by providing the truth. So it matters to the source that they are the source.
Then you didn’t hear the truth.
So…2+2=4 is true when Albert Einstein says it but false when Adolf Hitler says it?
I’m not buying that.