Remember kids, Tankies wants to undermine democracy - same as facists.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh… being (respectively) stabbed in the back by Bolsheviks and being sabotaged by Stalin had absolutely nothing to do with it, eh?

    No, tankie… I don’t think you’ve read any anarchist literature at all.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, the Spanish anarchists were unsuccessful because Stalin, and not because they refused to be integrated with the popular front(which even the fucking liberals joined), including militarily until the war was already well lost, which made coordinated actions against the fascists with the popular front impossible

      The lessons of the Spanish civil war dont reflect well on the anarchist movement there.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, the Spanish anarchists were unsuccessful because Stalin

        Yes. That’s why, tankie. And no… they didn’t lose because they decided not to take orders from your outrageously incompetent and cynical two-faced realpolitking fetish object Stalin.

        Okay?

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Okay so how much did you actually study the Spanish civil war because this comes off as really ignorant? Like, what books have you read on the subject that have led you to the conclusion that Stalin was controlling all of the Spanish Republicans except for the anarchists? You seem to deify Stalin much more than me, who generally considers him a very flawed leader who was a better revolutionary, but doesn’t consider him some octopus with his tentacles in literally everything.

          • masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not the one demonstrating weaponized ignorance on the subject, tankie - you are.

            But hey… bring it on.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              But hey… bring it on.

              It is a self dunk to get combative when someone asks you what books you’ve read on a subject you’re opining about

              • masquenox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why would I compare books with you, tankie? You’ve already claimed to have read things you so obviously haven’t.

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Hey, just cause I disagree with their analysis doesn’t mean I haven’t read it.

                  For example, forming a secret vanguard party isn’t the way to anarchism, and the Kronstadt rebellion wasn’t the pinnacle of revolution, even though the Soviets fucked up their response to it.

                  And you would know what I’m referring to if you’ve read some of their main works.

    • doidera@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, tankie… I don’t think you’ve read any anarchist literature at all.

      so now we are gonna start calling names. Cool, very mature.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, then… what do you think we should call them? Do remember… it was Marxist-Leninists themselves that came up with that term.