• TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re somehow WORSE than duckduckgo nowadays like how? You were the search leader, people used DDG for privacy reasons but they passed you??? Did you forget why you’re a company? It’s because you were the best fucking search engine ever and you decided to sell that title for ads or some shit. Incredible how Google fell off the fucking side of a mountain they themselves built!

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        For me it went from “great” to “usable” over the course of a decade or so, and then from “usable” to “worthless” over the course of six months. It’s a remarkably awful trajectory.

      • hagelslager@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And DuckDuckGo lacks basic stuff such as keyword exclusion. (It’s my main search engine for the last few years after Startpage got bought, but lacking keyword exclusion sucks!)

        • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          you can -something , but it isn’t full exclusion. It’s generally been good enough for me. I agree the full fat version would be nice.

        • rikonium
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yea I bailed after they nerfed exclusions and whatnot but not like the others are slam dunks

      • icedterminal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s pretty wild how Google search has degraded. The push for SEO has really ruined useful results.

        • qaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s interesting, but $120 a year is just too much for me.

              • snowe@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                When you use 1/10th the searches because you get it all in the very first query your usage goes wayyyy down. even then, you aren’t limited to 300 searches. you can go over, you just pay per search. and even with that if you can’t do that then just default to DDG then. I found DDG to be terrible, not at all better than Bing by itself, so Kagi was something I tried and immediately fell in love with. It just works. And I don’t have to worry about any of my data going anywhere at all, to any advertisers for anything, or for tracking, etc.

                • qaz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I’ve done 418 searches today and it’s still noon. That’s ~1254 a month. Even if my searches went down by 90% I’d still be 4.18 times over.

                  … Kagi was something I tried and immediately fell in love with. It just works.

                  Does it also work with very specific technical searches? Could it for example search for the behavior of atol when it encounters an alphabetical character? Neither Google, Bing nor DuckDuckGo provide me with an answer. Google doesn’t even show cppreference in the top 5.

      • DreamButt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is ddg actually good now? I remember it feeling nearly useless waay back when it was first hitting the scene. Might have to give it a shot again

        • jagungal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not a power user, but I’ve used DDG exclusively for a while now and I often forget that I’m using it. I’d say it’s a pretty seamless transition nowadays.

        • Renacles
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          You actually get the results you are looking for without the sponsored links. Sometimes you end up searching for reddit results but that’s every search engine.

          • snowe@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not kagi. I haven’t specified Reddit once since switching to kagi. It really is that much better than DDG and Google.

        • Nommer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I only use Google if DDG can’t find what I’m looking for. Usually Google doesn’t either if DDG can’t so lately I’ve been giving up after the DDG results. I can’t stand Google anymore. The first page of results is just ads and the next page is all irrelevant nonsense.

      • expatriado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        the auto predictions always give me more words than i need, so i have to type normally, like it wasn’t there, or select, hope it doesn’t load, and delete the extra words

        • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          And when i go to click on an auto prediction it changes it at the last damn second too. That drives me mad

          • ourob
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is my beef with basically all modern interfaces. Stuff changes and moves with just enough of a delay to cause me to miss click. Autocomplete changing recommendations on phones, UI elements shifting on web pages, etc.

            • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I thought i was getting old. I mean, i am, but this just enough delay miss-clicks make me feel even older

        • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          This has been something so frustrating that nobody seems to talk about. They really need to provide autofill that only adds the one next word, rather than two or three. Because otherwise, the autofill becomes useless.

  • Teknikal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dunno on one side we have Google trying to wreck the entire internet and have their ads in your face 95 percent of the time.

    On the other side is Microsoft who won’t leave you the hell alone when pushing they’re shit tiers programs and steal defaults on a weekly basis.

    To me the only solution is ruling both companies monopolys and fining them to hell and breaking them up. Both are out of control and ruining computing and the Internet.

    • ButtDrugs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Google could be broken up into

      • search
      • chrome / gsuite
      • YouTube
      • gcloud
      • ads
      • android. And I’m sure more

      MS

      • windows / office
      • azure
      • xbox
      • bing
        …I’m too tired to keep going lol

      If those had to all survive independently and couldn’t leech off profits of the parent organization we could have true competition. Instead you just need one super-profitable arm of a company than loss-lead your way into other verticals and out-compete everyone else because you don’t have to turn a profit, at least while the competition is still clinging on.

      • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ads are a core component of how search makes money. They’re also a core component of how YouTube makes money.

        • pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ads are what Google makes money with. That’s their core business. I would argue most of what they offer is just a different way of either delivering you ads or farming your data for…ads.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of those are still too big - Google ads basically just compete with facebooks. The two control the marketplace between ad buyers and sellers - too much power

        YouTube itself is far too powerful too - it’s one of the biggest platforms on top of the default video hosting service, giving them far too much control via the algorithm

        Microsoft’s Xbox isn’t a big deal, but the sheer number of publishers again gives them control over a marketplace

        What we need is to force them to rent out the network at cost, the way we do with cell phone providers. Force them to host buy/sell offers at cost, and serve ads with a limited amount of profit

        Plus, they’re too big even then - companies with that much money or control over discourse are a threat to democracy, full stop

        It’s a very messy situation we find ourselves in, but it’s only going to get worse the longer we let it fester

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Xbox specifically could be broken up into studios, publishers, and consoles.

    • Bone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And in the meantime, become a farmer! /s (you’d still have John Deere problems…)

  • WallEx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They should have invested in their potential, their search engines. It’s getting shittier almost daily.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Makes you wonder if they just stopped paying they’d have 23 billion more and I wonder what they’d lose in market share. If it is less than 23 bil it makes sense to just not pay.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s become easier than ever to spam out websites and spam content. It’s a plague on the web and I’m not sure what the cure is.

  • roo@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Relying on people’s apathy is a business model with eras of success. Most people have never changed a setting other than dark mode, and even then that’s probably your average superuser.

    • joel_feila@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      you are actually onto something. When Neeva went under, they were a paid search engine, they made a post explain why. The hardest part was getting people to pay a monthly sub, but getting them to change the settings

  • Luft@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    This validates my stubborn commitment to DuckDuckGo, ty

  • Corgana@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Crazy that it’s cheaper to do that than it is to build a product that can find recipe blogs that aren’t also novels.

  • MarkC568@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I happily pay $10 a month for Kagi and it’s freaking great.

    I’m never going back to Google.

    • systemglitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You pay for a search engine? You have a subscription to a search engine? I’m I understanding that right?

      It is a search engine right? My brain is struggling with this.

      • TheYear2525@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there something about search engines, as opposed to other online services, that makes you expect them to be free?

      • golli@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Personally i find $10 a month to be too expensive, but don’t we all pay for search engines in a way? With Google you don’t pay directly but with your information and by getting influenced in your behaviour (e.g. to buy something from someone who in return pays google for advertisement).

    • confusedwiseman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This feels like google when google was new. I’ve been using the summarizer more and reading the articles I send it to understand how it works. It definitely has its use cases

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hopefully the antitrust trial will end up telling Google they cannot pay anybody for preference of their browser. That would be the best outcome.

    The MO of current “market leaders” is not to compete but gatekeep.

    • Peanut@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Antitrust was just a nice idea. It’s kinda dead. Will remain dead unless we can purge corruption from politics. For some reason, most politicians seem averse to this idea.

      Luckily the party driven and heavily influential political roles are filled with diverse representatives from every walk of life and aren’t largely built around the same support circles and ideals that have already been entrenched for generations. With millions of citizens, its normal for the same handful of families to remain in power, with the exception of some rich celebrities who can win the popularity polls.

      Everything is fine.

      As long as the rich can get more money. That’s what is most important.

  • Steve@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It isn’t the default search engine on my browser. I’m using Kagi at the moment.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Even if it’s easy to switch browsers or platforms or search engines, the one that appears when you turn it on matters a lot.

    Google obviously agrees and has paid a staggering amount to make sure it is the default: testimony in the trial revealed that Google spent a total of $26.3 billion in 2021 to be the default search engine in multiple browsers, phones, and platforms.

    It was made public after a debate earlier in the week between the two sides and Judge Amit Mehta over whether the figure should be redacted.

    (Apple’s outsize percentage of the total is why that particular deal has been such a focus of the first weeks of the trial.)

    Until now, these numbers have been closely held secrets, leaving competitors and analysts to speculate about exactly what it’s worth to Google to be the near-universal default choice.

    He also said that he sees Yelp and Amazon as competitors and that, in such a hot market, Google has to do everything it can to stay relevant and compete.


    The original article contains 519 words, the summary contains 174 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • smileyhead
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s called innovation in capitalism.

  • ryan213@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Approximately 16% of their revenue or 29% of their profit. I’d take that tradeoff any day.