roo@lemmy.one to Fediverse@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoIf this ActivityPub-fueled change takes off, it will break every social network into a thousand pieceswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1153arrow-down17cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldfediverse_press@lemmy.worldfediverse@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgfediverse_press@lemmy.worldtechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1146arrow-down1external-linkIf this ActivityPub-fueled change takes off, it will break every social network into a thousand pieceswww.theverge.comroo@lemmy.one to Fediverse@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square27fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldfediverse_press@lemmy.worldfediverse@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgfediverse_press@lemmy.worldtechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareslacktoid@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 year agoLets cut to the chase and figure out decentralized identity management
minus-squareslacktoid@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoBlockchain is a 0 trust distributed ledger. It can store anything. The 0 trust forces it to do expensive things. That make it not worth it
minus-squarelambalicious@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoNo. And even if they did, there’s literally 1234567x different, better ways to solve that problem or any problem than “blockchain”.
minus-squarePorkSoda@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoLol blockchain still lookin’ for a problem to solve.
Lets cut to the chase and figure out decentralized identity management
Is this not what blockchains do?
Blockchain is a 0 trust distributed ledger. It can store anything. The 0 trust forces it to do expensive things. That make it not worth it
No.
And even if they did, there’s literally 1234567x different, better ways to solve that problem or any problem than “blockchain”.
Lol blockchain still lookin’ for a problem to solve.