I think the OP is trying to express that the New York times is distorting the news. Perhaps true, but humans doing stupid shit will always sell a newspaper.
I feel like hearing more kids dying with ass cancer stories and heart disease deaths and people dying from preventable diseases stories would probably shift people away from focusing just on guns and homicide and maybe actually cause people to care about science and solving those other things.
Not that those are good to not focus on, just that there’s already an ongoing anti vs pro gun conversation going and at least if we talk about something else that’s proportional causing deaths… well, I doubt there are many “pro-cancer” people out there (but I know it’s non-zero).
I guess I just want some positive momentum on something at this point.
If every single one of the estimated 10,000 deaths per year due to the polution from diesel vehicles in Europe was individually reported in the Press, we would have far stronger legislation against that kind of polution and the heads of the companies involved in the Diesel Scandal would be rotting in jail rather than some scapegoat engineer.
(I’m using an European example because that’s the data for deaths I remember, but I bet it’s the same or worse in the US).
It doesn’t have to be an accusation of distortion. Can also just be a reminder that every day reality is not what we read in the paper or see in movies.
It seems to me that the right’s answer to cancer and heart disease is that shit happens. The left wants universal healthcare and public funding of medical research.
On the left: shit happens
On the right: humans are doing stupid shit
I think the OP is trying to express that the New York times is distorting the news. Perhaps true, but humans doing stupid shit will always sell a newspaper.
Yeah, I also don’t think writing an article every time someone dies from cancer or a heart attack would benefit anyone.
I feel like hearing more kids dying with ass cancer stories and heart disease deaths and people dying from preventable diseases stories would probably shift people away from focusing just on guns and homicide and maybe actually cause people to care about science and solving those other things.
Not that those are good to not focus on, just that there’s already an ongoing anti vs pro gun conversation going and at least if we talk about something else that’s proportional causing deaths… well, I doubt there are many “pro-cancer” people out there (but I know it’s non-zero).
I guess I just want some positive momentum on something at this point.
If every single one of the estimated 10,000 deaths per year due to the polution from diesel vehicles in Europe was individually reported in the Press, we would have far stronger legislation against that kind of polution and the heads of the companies involved in the Diesel Scandal would be rotting in jail rather than some scapegoat engineer.
(I’m using an European example because that’s the data for deaths I remember, but I bet it’s the same or worse in the US).
It doesn’t have to be an accusation of distortion. Can also just be a reminder that every day reality is not what we read in the paper or see in movies.
It seems to me that the right’s answer to cancer and heart disease is that shit happens. The left wants universal healthcare and public funding of medical research.
Politically you are probably right. New York Times? A business that likely wishes to sell more subscriptions.