Guess what though, that’s what the literature supports.

that claim is beyond the scope of that study, which didn’t actually consider any source of ghg emissions except agriculture.

i didn’t downvote anything.

poore-nemecek 2018 is pretty low-quality. they attribute everything fed to livestock as emissions necessary in rearing livestock, but that’s just not true: much of what is fed to livestock would outherwise be waste, so feeding it to livestock is a conservation of resources, and not a net emission.