I’m not defending him per se, but the email response was interesting. I have no idea if this was a reasonable fee mount for the services.

I guess the thing that’s interesting to me, is that Twitter the company doesn’t benefit directly from hiring the firm to close the transaction, the original shareholders do. I would wonder why they weren’t paying the firm, as they received the payment? It would be like assigning sellers closing costs bill (agent fees etc) to the house, to be paid by the new owner, and not to the seller.

I think the whole thing is weird, and believe he’s still an insane cunt.