• worlds_okayest_mech_pilot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Exactly. Gamers conflate having something be an “art form” with “you’re not allowed to make fun of my hobbies”.

    I remember this one time in a literature review class, we were critiquing this one work (I can’t remember what it was, sadly), and this one guy was clearly new to higher-level English and Lit classes. So he puts his hand up after about 20 minutes of discussion and goes, “I don’t get it. Are we, like, making fun of the book? I don’t understand.”

    It was just funny to me that someone who had never experienced literature discussion before genuinely thought the professor was mocking the book for a laugh, and that’s it. I don’t blame the guy at all, he wasn’t a chud and was actually eager to learn. It just goes to show that there are so many people out there that fundamentally do not understand art or discussion. Especially, capital-G Gamers will throw a massive fit whenever someone attempts to publically move gaming past “consume product”.

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I failed college English 101 bc I failed to understand that I wasn’t supposed to write some sort of deductive proof based on the work. My TA was also bad at telling me this; I think bc they failed to understand how my approach wasn’t the typical one.