“As the president of the United States, you have power to change the course of history, and the responsibility to save lives right now,” the staffers wrote.

  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not trying to be condescending. I’m just incapable of explaining this in a satisfactory way. Those criticizing the headline are not pointing out anything meaningful. The information in the article correlates with the headline. Biden has the ability to endorse a ceasefire, “while” his former staffers are urging him to do so.

    • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You are incapable of explaining it because it is an incredibly common and recognizable representation of a bad faith headline.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Summarizing an article and writing a headline isn’t easy. I know from experience. It may be in bad faith, it doesn’t appear that way to me. It doesn’t detract from the relevant information in the article.

        • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          FWIW I think the administration could, should, and (unfortunately) probably won’t do more to support a cease fire.

          I just don’t think my opinion justifies misrepresenting what actually occurred in a headline intentionally.

          And the author of the headline did. They knew. And if you have experience, you know they knew.