The title says it all. Can you write a bill in such a way that those who vote against it will not benefit from it if it should pass anyway?
The title says it all. Can you write a bill in such a way that those who vote against it will not benefit from it if it should pass anyway?
I’m not seeing the issue here. It did pass. Politicians aren’t normally the type to take a moral high ground in issues. If there’s money available for your state, you should take it.
If there’s money for your state and you want part of it, then vote for it.