• donio@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    When you have a goose that produces a reliable daily supply of golden eggs do you:

    1. keep collecting your daily egg
      or
    2. see if giving it a good kick or two gets you more eggs
    • Petri@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Damn straight - they can take my NewPipe from my cold dead hands :-)

  • nighty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    They have really gone all out on the whole enshittification process during the past couple of years, haven’t they?

  • manned_meatball@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    oh boy, I wish youtube kills itself like reddit is doing right now so decentralized alternatives can become widely adopted

    • pinwurm@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      YouTube is a bit of a different animal.

      YouTube allows creators to monetize content - so there’s a sense of shared success. Channels from Tom Scott or Captain Disillusion are amazing, because their production in part relies on that revenue model.

      YouTube also understands that without paying for popular content, you won’t get the consistent cavalcade of medium content from people that want to earn a living or notoriety through YouTube. And that include anything from videos of cats falling over, blogs about life in remote places, DIY home improvement or niche guitar technique lessons.

      Meanwhile on Reddit, if a user gets thousands of upvotes and a million page views for a short story they wrote exclusively for the platform, Reddit won’t pay them a cent. The very thought is laughable.

      The other thing to consider is that the technology just doesn’t exist for there to be a viable ‘federated’ YouTube. YouTube has 800 million videos - many in HD and many are hours long. That’s a big ask in terms of storage and maintenance - even several thousand videos.

      Video compression has a long way to go before that changes. For now, it makes sense for leave that storage to the companies with resources.

      Text, however… well, all of Wikipedia can fit on around 20 gigs - 60 million odd articles. And for the record, that can pretty much fit on an iPod from 2002.

      I do wish that YouTube wasn’t a monopoly. Twitch is the only thing that’s close, and it has it’s own special lane for live streaming. Back in the old days, there was some competition - including Google Video. But that went away when Google bought YouTube. I guess there’s Vimeo, but they’ve got a very different approach.

      I mean, the Justice Department is suing Google for monopolizing ad tech - and I think we could see antitrust laws used in the next few years to breakup YouTube. Maybe the successor companies would federate - like when Bell was broken up into what became Verizon and ATT - who now directly compete for customers.

      • Link@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The other thing to consider is that the technology just doesn’t exist for there to be a viable ‘federated’ YouTube.

        Well, Peertube exists. But I agree it is very hard to get close to the amount of videos YouTube hosts without it becoming too expensive. But that is even true for companies like Google, which is why they are pushing these changes. It seems like people need to accept that a video platform must either show ads, make you subscribe, or receive substantial donations.

        I almost can’t believe Wikipedia is only 20GB btw. Does that include all the pictures on there?

        • PureTryOut@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Does that include all the pictures on there?

          It can’t. 60 million odd articles with pictures only taking 20GB? I doubt it. Just the text taking up so few space that I can believe.

  • waspentalive@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    As fill-in ads are a vector for computer viruses and other malware I for one will NOT be disabling my ad blocker unless YouTube is willing to provide a lifetime subscription to something like Life Lock and make me whole for anything lost to whatever malware arrives as a part of an ad.

    Where else can I watch sci-show, Linus-tech-tips, and all the other channels I subscribe to?

    • beatniak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Just use newpipe. It’s youtube without the ads. Doesn’t have casting support, but it allows you to download the videos. You can also listen/download to the audio of videos, without fetching the video.

      • blank_sl8@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Newpipe will probably be blocked as well if youtube is doing this. Honestly not sure why youtube hasn’t blocked yt-dlp and others already.

        • KindnessInfinity@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s not easily block able as it scrapes the YouTube website. They’d have to stop having a website for that to happen.

          • dan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The problem with scraping is that while it’s difficult/impossible to block completely, it’s pretty easy to keep making changes to your site to disrupt scrapers. The work required by the scraper to adapt to those changes is usually way more than the work you put in to disrupt them.

            So if a commercial site wants to make scraping unreliable and impractical, they almost certainly can.

          • dogmuffins@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            this particular cat and mouse has been going on for a long time.

            Although I get the impression it’s not particularly aggressive.

            There was a while there about a year ago where newpipe seemed to break every week and you had to install the next patch version from github. It’s not like newpipe had to develop some new workaround or something, just changed class names or something.

  • LostCause@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    When will companies finally understand that some people won‘t watch ads no matter what tricks they employ. I‘d rather watch no video at all than a single ad. If that is their goal, fine.

  • dan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Then I’m going to begin not fucking watching YouTube.

    • kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      There is a federated version of YouTube…

      But storing video is a massive challenge, way harder than dealing with a Lemmy or Mastodon instance.

      • dan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        My rational mind realises it’s such an expensive system to run that it’s reasonable for them to charge or show ads. The problem is they’ve been extremely aggressive with ads and pushing subscriptions, to the point where I’m pretty resentful of the idea. Plus they’ve neglected so many things (like allowing aggressive copyright predators and refusing to implement sensible human-based appeals processes) that they really should have dealt with and instead embraced an algorithm that I’m pretty sure is at least partially responsible for the radicalisation of large groups of people.

        I… don’t mind paying for shit. I just don’t want to give them money.

        Also: wow there’s federated video sharing? Bet that’s not cheap to run.

      • Banzai51@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The federated version also breaks one of YouTube’s bigger strengths: Just browsing for something interesting.

  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    We did the Twitter to Mastodon migration. Now we are doing the Reddit to Lemmy/kbin migration. When are we doing the YouTube to Peertube migration?

  • Landor Dragen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    YouTube is the only Google service I use on a regular basis. Happy to leave them behind if they continue with this type of behavior.

    It would be less convenient, but it is what it is and if there’s one thing I can’t stand, it’s ads.

  • Chaos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I really think that Brave will circumvent this. Btw, YouTube will sue Invidious if they don’t stop offering the service in the following weeks. So I think YouTube is onto something here.