It comes up almost every year now. Personally… This feels so easy to fix. Just send someone out in front of Brundle to gauge everyone’s interest, or just tell him to back off a bit when he meets legitimate resistance. Why manufacturer drama like this? The sport just doesn’t need it in my opinion. He had two opportunities to not do what he did this weekend, but he pressed on.

Sure, it’s historical and all. But it just feels a little greasy to essentially force an interview on someone. Who is to say that Brundle can demand someone interview with him? Why are we owed that? I like Brundle and his way of interviewing, but I feel like he needs to be more respectful of those that aren’t there to be interviewed. We don’t own celebrities and no one is owed an interview simply because a celebrity decided to attend a race.

Thoughts?

  • hypnotoad@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah and getting a random actor/actress’ opinion has zero bearing on the race to me, so if said random person doesn’t want to participate, what have we all lost out on? Nothing. We are simply manufacturing controversy here for no reason. Again though, just my opinion.

    • misery mansion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you are all getting it wrong. The content they want is the content they got, on this occasion. The fact that it has gone viral is proof of this.

      Martin is a bit less energetic these days than he used to be but he’s knowledgeable enough to know that that was all he was likely to get from that interaction and here we are talking about it.

      The worst thing would be to lose the classic British dry wit and not have the sarcasm!