• KrummsHairyBalls@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s great. Most older people aren’t juggling two apps.

    I’m also not sending baby photos because fuck kids, but if I wanted to send photos, it wouldn’t be compressed over signal or WhatsApp.

    • beeng
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • KrummsHairyBalls@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago
        • Any of the million storage options (Proton Drive, OneDrive, Gmail, Mega, etc)
        • Google Photos in full quality
        • Sending a public link that is self hosted on my NAS

        I dont use MMS, I use RCS, and even then, if I cared about quality, I am not sending it directly via any chat service as they will compress it.

          • KrummsHairyBalls@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well if you look back and read, you’ll see where I said I’m not sending baby pics, so no, I’m not juggling separate apps.

            If someone wants to send me a pic, MMS is fine, because it’s good enough quality to get the point across. If I cared about quality, I’m not using any messenger, including signal, to send my photos. I’ll send them uncompressed another way.

            Signal removing SMS fallback was dumb, plain and simple. I’ve switched to Google messages now where I can use encrypted RCS and fallback to SMS.