Hello Everyone, I was planning to get a hard drive to install Linux in to use for daily driving. I was looking at Nobara for a bit but after the RedHat drama, should I still be using it? or should I look at something else for the time being? Thank you.
No, nothing RedHat is doing affects Nobara. Nobara is based on Fedora, which is upstream of RedHat. Nothing is changing.
I heard the guy working on Nobara works at Redhat tho. Idk what this means but if It doesn’t mean anything for Fedora then it should be fine right?
I have no idea who signs his paychecks, but no, none of the announcement about the RHEL Sources affects Fedora in any way, unless Nobara is pulling sources from RHEL (which it isn’t) this doesn’t affect it at all. Nobara isn’t an official Fedora, or RedHat product or project.
oh okay cool. thank you.
My recommendation is just don’t buy into one distro too much. Play around with a few, shit play around with 10. Figure out your desktop environment, your terminal, install your files onto a separate partition you can use from anything.
The big changes between distributions don’t really affect every day consumers. They can all run Gnome, KDE, XFCE, bash, fish… They can all run all the software. A few, like your Debian or Fedora based might have a couple better drivers, but even then they’ll all be pretty comparable. They all have package managers that are usually some flavor of apt, yum, or Flatpak. If you want to use terminal utilities they all come with coreutils. Every one is good to learn to code.
Play with what you want, abandon it, and play with something else.
Advice from someone who’s been daily driving a Linux box since 1998 and who uses it every day professionally.
Distro-hopping is a valid hobby, but it’s not for everyone. If you aren’t specifically interested in distros and fiddling with packages, hopping around on your “daily driver” can be disruptive. If you just want something that works, there’s nothing wrong with figuring out which distros do what you need and using one of those for work and play. If something catastrophic happens to a distro to make it literally unusable, you can worry about that when it happens. There is usually something else which is almost the same. Few people will get much value from hopping between distros which are basically the same, just because the distros are put out by different companies or install different packages by default.
Oh that’s totally fair. I guess my point is if you’re just looking for something that’ll work then that’s just about any of them. I’d pick the one with the most results on StackOverflow because it’s most likely to have any issues resolved. And even then, to be honest, that’s just a habit from 25 years ago when issues were a thing, these days pretty much everything just works.
If you’re asking about distro recommendations I guess I expect a distro hopper.
I read the explanation about this somewhere on the Nobara website, but I can’t seem to find it. Someone else was asking about this so I’ll just paste what I said there. This is a paraphrase of what I read on the Nobara site. If anyone can find the actual explanation it would be better, but this is how I understood what he said:
The way it was explained to me was Fedora = RHEL Alpha, CentOS Stream = RHEL Beta, RHEL is Stable, then there are downstreams who build against RHEL. Only those who are downstream of REHL are effected by the changes. Both Fedora and Cent are necessary development platforms to support everything that eventually makes it down to RHEL in stable condition. They both depend on RHEL for funding, but RHEL depends on them for testing.
I’m not knowledgeable enough to have a clue about the original question since I’m pretty new to Linux overall. Just wanted to say that I selected Nobara for my gaming PC and it’s been a pretty smooth ride. My windows drive is second in the boot order and is probably starting to feel a bit neglected.
