• hanekam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s been seventy years now. How long do you think dead Britons will have more responsibility for and power over India and Pakistan than the people in those countries?

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      ? They actually spent a lot of time looking over census data to see where the majorities were. That’s why some of the lines are so weird.

      • kryostar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re misunderstanding the issue. The British tried to fix certain issues that really didn’t need fixing. To their credit they did abolish a few insane practices, but the partition was never gonna be a good thing.

        I’m not a historian. I’m just recounting stuff I’ve been taught.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          From what I know, when Britain left India they really did need to partition it. I’ve never heard anyone say wanted India and Pakistan to be one.

          • SchizoDenji@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So you’ve never talked to Indians or Pakistanis about partition.

            Because partition was a mistake and letting a nation being found on the basis of religion was terrible, and you can literally see it with how politically unstable Pakistan has been and how they are housing terrorists like Dawood or funding them.

      • lemmesay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        disagree. see Radcliffe Line and its implementation.
        spending five weeks to decide fate of 80 million people without even visiting the place in person isn’t spending “a lot of time.”