So in this episode they go into a cave, and can read some sort of energy field, as well as Troi having a sense that there are lifeforms present. Geordie explains that the people must be displaced in time, but only by a few milliseconds. If that’s true, how is there not overlap? Say the people are a few milliseconds ahead of the enterprise when they arrive, shouldn’t they appear a few milliseconds later, as they still would have had to be ‘present’ during that time? I don’t understand how they would be consistently invisible if time is a dimension like space that can be traveled through. Some past (or future) version of them would be present regardless of the desynchronization would they not?

Please if anyone could help me understand or shed some light on this I’d appreciate it.

  • @Ensign_Seitler@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    618 days ago

    My understanding of the concept was that it was something like multiple channels of data being sent along the same wire. So long as the frequencies are the right kind of different they’ll essentially exist completely independent of each other.

    Maybe this requires a minimum of two time dimensions so that the variance can result in the different beings following time along different “tracks”?

    I took Troi’s awareness of the beings to be a result of the intermittent overlapping bits of time where they did overlap. Like, it happened too quickly to perceive visually, but enough for the empath to have something to pick up on.

  • @half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    318 days ago

    Here’s a shot at the balloon filling up with water explanation:

    It’s like two cars driving down a highway at night. You see the headlights from the car ahead of you illuminating the scenery, but you never catch up to them.

    • @SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      I think OP is implying that time works like a film strip, so that if I’m five minutes behind you, I see where you were five minutes ago.

      That’s the way time travel in Trek works. If you travel from Time B in the future to Time A in the past at a given place, you see the place as it was at that time, including the people who were there.

      I think that rather being just shifted in time a la time travel, they were actually dealing with a flex in spacetime, like a curve in the road you can’t quite see around, but Diana could see their essence like light from the tail lights, as in your example.

      In other words, they were caught in a time warp, again.

  • @rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    You won’t be able to make sense of it because the idea is just some nonsense words made up by writers as a means of allowing the story they wanted to tell to be told. It doesn’t make sense because it’s writing, not science.

    Edit: fascinated by the downvotes.

    • @emeralddawn45OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      418 days ago

      There’s a lot of made up nonsense in star trek, sure, but there’s also a reason they call it ‘science’ fiction. I guess my question had two points. Firstly to see if anyone more knowledgeable than ne could either confirm that it’s nonsense or give me a way that it’s actually potentially possible based on some legitimate scientific theory, or secondly, like the other person said, just to see how people could use their creativity to explain away the inconsistency in universe.

      • @rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        217 days ago

        if anyone more knowledgeable than ne could either confirm that it’s nonsense or give me a way that it’s actually potentially possible based on some legitimate scientific theory

        Ah, an actual answer.

    • @Lumidaub@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      318 days ago

      The downvotes are because what you wrote is pointless. We all know it’s made up and in the end there is no actual, definitive, real answer. That’s not what we’re here for. We are here for the creative exercise of finding an answer that fits the universe of the show and episode. You just shut down that creative process.

      • @rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        218 days ago

        We all know it’s made up and in the end there is no actual, definitive, real answer

        We are here for the creative exercise of finding an answer that fits the universe of the show and episode.

        OP’s question gives the impression that they’re here for an actual answer.

    • @williams_482@startrek.websiteM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      017 days ago

      As other posters have pointed out to you, blithely dismissing OP’s question because they are asking about the meaning of “nonsense words made up by writers” is completely missing the point of this community. We all know Star Trek is fiction constructed by writers; pointing that out while adding nothing else of interest is both pointless and boring.

      We don’t expect or require all answers to be from an in-universe perspective, but we do expect everyone to engage in discussion politely and seriously. If this is all you have to say on the subject, don’t comment.

      • @rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        217 days ago

        we do expect everyone to engage in discussion politely and seriously

        My response was both serious and polite. No idea what you’re talking about.