• BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    The students receive something of value (education they can’t get at home) for either money directly if they have it, or cheaper labour to pay for that education and support themselves.

    It’s bad for Canadian workers because it suppresses wages, but it’s not exploitative by default. Nobody is forcing them to come to Canada, and nobody is forcing them to work at these types of jobs. Almost all the companies employing them meet the minimum Canadian labour and pay standards.

    Not that there aren’t specific businesses being assholes and breaking the laws, but overall it’s not exploitation.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The way they’ve underestimated living costs and increased the ability to work for students, all while ignoring diploma-mill schools points at a pattern of knowingly allowing exploitation

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is the government allowing exploitation of Canadians by letting them work at these companies? Canadian citizens have the same costs of living, and it’s not like Tim Hortons(just an example) doesn’t employee local students too.

        • phx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          By upping the number of people willing to work for lower wages/benefits, which undercuts the bargaining position of the populace at large? Yes