• usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      more importantly cops don’t actually give a shit about solving crime.

      In England the police primarily exist to keep noise down in middle class areas. I assume it’s even worse in America

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That is their primary purpose here too but it just requires more violence and subjection, Americans are extra noisy.

      • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I’ve been in this situation as a victim. My bike was stolen and they said it would take hours to search the CCTV. I told them about binary search, they didn’t understand.

      • Sparking@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, seriously. What is even the context of this? We have no idea. The cops might have been like “We need a warrant to look at that footage you idiot.”

        • kablammy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Whoever owns the camera presumably has an interest in reducing/solving crime in the area (why else have cameras?), so they would likely be happy to make the footage available to police if asked nicely, with no warrant required.

          • Sparking@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, in general, but not necessarily in that circumstance. A lot of time talking to tech people (I’m a softwar engineer) they can can be smug about this while leaving out important context.