• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah, Hossenfelder has had a bad habit of stepping outside of her lane. From what I’ve heard from physicists, she’s questionable even inside her lane.

    • Chrobin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      She might have strong opinions on particle physics and I do take them with a grain of salt, but I don’t see objectively wrong things in there.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given that you thought that factoring primes was the only real world application of QC, I frankly don’t take your opinion here very seriously. Breaking encryption is one of the least interesting applications of QC. It’s just the one that gets all the headlines. Yes, even for “proper industrial use”.

        • Chrobin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Thanks for this productive discourse, not ad hominem at all. You’re welcome to criticize my views and I’m happy to learn. And I am doing my physics masters, so I think I am no complete idiot. But this is also not productive.

          Edit: I’m focusing on cosmology, I’m not claiming to be a quantum computing expert. That was just my last state of knowledge and I’m always happy to learn.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Focusing on what QC will do to encryption tends to mean you got most of your knowledge about them from pop sci articles. As you can see from this very thread, you’re hardly alone in this, but it remains a big red flag for people who don’t know what they’re talking about on this subject.

            • Chrobin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe I just mixed up the fact that proper industrial use is vastly overestimated/overhyped with that there is little use. I will do some research.

              • frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The pharmaceutical use alone would be revolutionary. There’s a whole other discussion about how the pharmaceutical industry will continue to overcharge for drugs, but that’s separate from the technology itself.