• orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      They aren’t the only ones, though. The rich find more than enough write-offs.

    • Welt@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      How do you reckon we make that happen? Any hope, or are they as powerful as billionaires?

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      What? Churches are specifically exempt from ALL taxes in the US. I clouding income, property, and all others.

      • Fondots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s unacceptable that they’re the only ones who are officially exempt.

        Kind of seems like the person you’re replying to is well-aware of that, and when they said “Churches need to pay taxes,” they didn’t mean it as “churches are currently legally obligated to pay taxes” but rather “churches paying taxes is something that needs to happen.”

      • macbayne82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not quite. Churches are exempt from many taxes, but not all, as a part of the separation of church and state.

        Churches do need to pay their share of FICA, Social Security, and other income-related taxes. Clergy are also required to pay income taxes, though they are permitted some tax-exempt benefits, most notably church-provided housing.

        That being said, I’d completely agree with removing tax-exempt status from churches that breach the separation of church and state, beginning with those that outright tell their members who to vote for.