1.“Federal agencies have the authority to intervene in protests, picket signs, or blockades. The law is impartial: it must be enforced without exception.”

2.“Federal forces are not required to have judicial oversight for their actions.”

3.“Forces are not obligated to consider alternative entrances or pathways. If the main path is blocked, their duty is to clear it.”

4.“This action continues until the flow of traffic is fully restored.”

5.“To carry out these acts, forces will use the minimum necessary force, which is sufficient and proportional to the situation they are addressing.”

6.“Instigators and organizers of the protest will be identified.”

7.“Vehicles used in the protest will be identified and subjected to citations or penalties.”

8.“Data of the instigators, accomplices, participants, and organizers will be transmitted to the authorities through appropriate channels.”

9.“Notices will be sent to the judge in cases of damage, such as burning flags.”

10.“In cases involving minors, relevant authorities will be notified, and the guardians of these youths who bring them to these demonstrations will face sanctions and punishment.”

11.“The costs incurred by security operations will be borne by the responsible organizations or individuals. In cases involving foreigners with provisional residency, information will be forwarded to the National Directorate of Immigration.”

12.“A registry will be created for organizations that participate in these types of actions.”

  • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    16·
    11 months ago

    First off, what is up with your reading comprehension?

    You do realize that lots of food produced in USSR would just rot not reaching anybody purely because of logistics being fucked up?

    You do realize I am speaking of the current systems production of food, right? You do realize we can treat food in such a way as to not have it spoil, right? You do realize we are currently disposing of 40% of food, before it even hits store shelves, right? We dispose of this food, not because it is spoiled, but because it will not sell for as much as the rest of it, and it selling it would increase supply, lowering profits made. This is the current system we live in.

    Now lets go thru your answers.

    People wouldn’t die from hunger caused by poverty there in its fatter years, yes, here you are right

    The USSR had one famine at the nascence of the unions existence. Communist China has had one famine at the nascense of existence. The capitalist west has millions starve every year, despite centuries of existense.

    You are trying to prove that USSR was as bad as everyone else? With Afghanistan and all?.. I may agree, so?

    Ahahahaha eyyy you managed to name afghanistan. Now let’s compare to the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change

    The key word here is “can” as opposed to “will be as a rule”.

    Lmao what is this weak attempt at semantics? “Uh uh excuse me, you used the word ‘can’ not ‘will’”. Buddy, I gave you a slew of examples of things that happened and are happening in the us, which, once again, has the largest prisoner population on the globe. Interacting with police in the US will, as a rule, end badly for you. As a rule, upsetting the US regime, will get you arrested (at best).

    Again, are you trying to prove USSR was as bad as everyone else? In general yeah. Only designed the way that it failed.

    I am highlighting how your idea of governance is rooted in an idealistic and unrealistic view of reality.

    Their properties and power can be taken away any time.

    Yes, billionaires property can be taken away at any time. That time is when they break the law. This is a good thing.