• GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not “large numbers of civilian casualties”

      It’s “the VAST majority of deaths are innocent civilians”. It’s like if Texas kidnapped 5 random citizens to kill every time someone was given the death sentence. Would you say that’s acceptable because it’s just “collateral damage”?

      • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is by design on the part of Hamas though. It doesn’t excuse the situation, but it does make it more complicated especially with regard to intent, which has to matter when considering charges of genocide.

          • TheFonz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t know that one negative makes the other right. They can both be culpable of fabricating this situation to feed larger interests. IDF is reeling in Bibi’s dirty war and Hamas is Iran’s puppet to destabilize the region. They are all shitheads, as history had shown. I don’t know why leftys have coraled around defending Hamas when it’s the Palestinian people suffering the brunt of their actions.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh, look… the White Supremacism Fan Brigade is blaming genocide on the victims of genocide again.

          Of course, the liberals who run Lemmy.world will ban me if I call you a fascist or a white supremacist… because reasons.

          • djdadi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            You don’t think two things can be true at the same time? Hamas absolutely are using human shield tactics, and have been for as long as they’ve been in existence. There are articles on the Internet showing how and why they do this years back.

            AND at the same time, Israel is using that fact to bomb much more indiscriminately than they could be.

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mate if they orchestrated a complete mass murder in an instant, absolutely no one would be able to defend it. This way, people get to just say “well, it’s war”.

    • tory@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Genocide: the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.

      It’s a genocide. Your point is they could probably be more efficient and obvious about the civilian murder. Therefore, it’s not a genocide.

      Your point is moronic.

      • djdadi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think their point is that: of course it’s not the intention to wipe them out, because if it was, it would already have been done on Oct 8th. Which isn’t a terrible argument.

        Hamas has stated it wants to genocide Israel, and their actions match that. Indiscriminate rocket fire, suicide bombing, invading etc. essentially everything they can do.

        By contrast Israel has not (officially) said they want to genocide Palestine, and they aren’t using even a fraction of the weapons at their disposal. Personally, I see their actions more as angry and sloppy. What’s the alternative, that they’re going to kill hundreds of people a day for the next years? That’s ridiculous.

        • tory@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          of course it’s not the intention to wipe them out, because if it was, it would already have been done on Oct 8th.

          Unless they wanted to commit a genocide while maintaining just enough plausible deniability to have people like you and I debating their intentions while it happens.

          In which case it would look… exactly how it looks. Crazy, that.

    • TomAwsm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right. Because if their goal was to wipe out all Palestinians, they would of course put all of their efforts and resources towards that without letting international politics affect what they do and how they do it… /s

    • djdadi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      All of these posts are so weird to me about arguing that Israel is commiting genocide. No one seems to mention or care that over and over again Hamas has admitted and encouraged genocide against Israel. But they’re smaller so I guess it’s okay?

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        One is a terrorist group. The other famously self-describes as “the only democracy in the Middle East”.

        Do you really think we should have equal expectations?

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      And Nazi Germany could have used poison gas to clear the western USSR of it’s population so much faster - so I guess there was nothing genocidal about Nazi Germany, eh apologist?