• Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s in their own methodology:

      https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/15/how-we-are-choosing-americas-top-states-for-business-in-2023.html

      We look at inclusiveness in state laws, including protections against discrimination of all kinds

      And with surveys showing a sizeable percentage of women considering reproductive rights in deciding where they are willing to live and work, we factor abortion laws into this category as well.

      That category is the 4th highest weighted category in their methodology, 0.4% behind “Economy”. So basically if abortion isn’t legal or if “gender affirming healthcare” isn’t legal, you lose in the 4th largest category and will be down the bottom.

      Look at the list and their “weaknesses”

      10: Inclusiveness, Reproductive Rights

      9: Crime, Inclusiveness, Reproductive Rights, Health Care

      8: Inclusiveness, Crime, Voting Rights

      7: Childcare, Inclusiveness

      6: Voting Rights, Reproductive Rights, Crime

      5 & 4: Voting Rights, Worker Protections, Inclusiveness, Health / Health, Worker Protections, Inclusiveness, Crime, Voting Rights

      3: Child Care, Crime, Reproductive Rights

      2: Reproductive Rights, Health, Voting Rights

      1: Reproductive Rights, Health, Voting Rights, Worker Protections, Inclusiveness

      Literally every single one of them is inclusiveness and/or reproductive rights, ie. Gender Affirming Care and Abortion.

      They even go so far as to pretty obviously say this is why they are the bottom 10 - on every one of them they list only their Life, Health & Inclusion Score. Nothing about the Economy score, the Infrastructure score, or the Workforce score. Nothing about cost of business score, business friendliness score, or Education score - just “Life, Health, and Inclusion Score” as if that’s the only thing that matters.

      Also - what is an “OANN show”?

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That category is the 4th highest weighted category in their methodology, 0.4% behind “Economy”. So basically if abortion isn’t legal or if “gender affirming healthcare” isn’t legal, you lose in the 4th largest category and will be down the bottom.

        Where it fucking belongs.

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Who cares if there are no jobs, schools, technology or services or infrastructure as long as you can get abortions and gender affirming care, right?

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who cares if there are no jobs, schools, technology or services or infrastructure

            Well, as long as the state is bigoted enough, you don’t seem to care about education, services, or infrastructure. Republican efforts to undermine education by undermining public schools in favor of vouchers for christian schools that teach creationism, miseducating students about the country’s history and banning books under the guise of “stopping woke” put the lie to your bogus handwringing about education. Services? At least one of those states didn’t even pass the medicaid expansion because they were happy to watch poor people suffer than accept money from a program championed by a black president. Infrastructure? Texas has a shitty failing power grid because the alternative involves accepting national standards that might have kept the damned grid from freezing over.

            Don’t pretend to care about any of those things. Your sole criterion for a good state is if the state government makes sure “those people” know their place.

            • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              banning books under the guise of “stopping woke”

              Pre-teens should not be given books talking about anal sex, oral sex, masturbation, and telling them that if they like stereotypical girl things they’re probably a girl trapped in a boys body. I’m sorry but anyone that thinks that’s fine probably belongs on a watch list.

              What “place” do you think I want “those people” to know?

              Btw I’m not American and I don’t live in America. Don’t ever want to either. I’m just interested in politics all over the world and aren’t afraid of voicing my opinion.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I was actually talking about US history books and how they deal with the civil rights movement, but your unfounded anti-trans moral panic has already been well established.

                Btw I’m not American and I don’t live in America.

                Good. I’m glad you’re not in a position to vote.