• cameron_vale@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Something algorithmic. I have a couple ideas in that direction.

    Assuming a good moderation automation, what good reason would anybody have for wanting the job?

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I started a community (forgottenweapons) here because I missed that content from when I used Reddit. So I’m a mod by default.

      I think the issue is the ‘assuming good auto moderation’ part. We’ve seen attempts in video games at auto moderation. That ends up in comedic errors like banning Spanish people for saying the word black in their native tongues.

      I think a human touch will always be necessary in these kinds of judgement calls. Or at least they will be for some time.

      • Wolf Link 🐺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think a human touch will always be necessary in these kinds of judgement calls.

        Definitely. I know of someone who got automatically banned for writing a comment like “that guy must be hung” (as in “having a big member”) as a jokingly lighthearted reply in a comment thread of people just messing around. The bot interpreted it as “someone has to hang that guy” and slammed down the ban hammer for inciting violence.

        And actual human being would have instantly realized from the context that there was no need to interfere, but bots are tone-deaf.

        • cameron_vale@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Well that would be an example of automation that needs improving.

          That’s what software developers do, right?