“Google has taken great pains to appear more open than Apple, licensing the Android operating system to third parties like Samsung and allowing users to install apps via other methods than the Play store. Apple does neither. When it comes to exclusivity, Apple has become synonymous with “walled garden” in the public imagination. So why did a jury find that Google held a monopoly but Apple didn’t?”

  • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Apple definitely sells the OS. That’s one of the main selling points and part of why their hardware is stupid expensive.

    • OpenStars@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Although ironically, the OS software itself is free to end users, as are future upgrades.

      Google also sells hardware, e.g. in its Pixel line, and there too the OS software is “free”, as are future upgrades, up to a point.

      Both sell listings in their respective stores.

      These concepts are getting murkier over time.