Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year ago"If trains were first invented today, they would never be built. No rail-less nations are building rail networks. No, China doesn't count because they're the Paragon of poor economic choices."hexbear.netimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up173arrow-down1image"If trains were first invented today, they would never be built. No rail-less nations are building rail networks. No, China doesn't count because they're the Paragon of poor economic choices."hexbear.netTankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square77fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·1 year ago: “YOU DISAGREED! YOU DISAGREED! THAT PROVES ME RIGHT SOMEHOW!” And if China is the paragon of poor economic choices, then how is it considered a threat to US hegemony?
minus-squareTrashGoblin [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·1 year agoEnemy simultaneously too weak and too strong.
minus-squareDanComrd [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 year agoSchrödinger’s Russia’s Fallacy Paradox
: “YOU DISAGREED! YOU DISAGREED! THAT PROVES ME RIGHT SOMEHOW!”
And if China is the paragon of poor economic choices, then how is it considered a threat to US hegemony?
Enemy simultaneously too weak and too strong.
Schrödinger’s Russia’s Fallacy Paradox