• Deebster@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    No, the downvote is meant to be for things that don’t contribute to the discussion, not for things you disagree with.

    • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Is this documented for Lemmy or just grandfathered from Reddit?

      Not all instances even support upvotes. Some only support downvotes. Does every instance have to agree on the meaning?

      • Deebster@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Good question. The documentation says:

        On the left side of each post there are up and down arrows, which let you upvote or downvote it. You can upvote posts that you like so that more users will see them. Or downvote posts so that they are less likely to be seen.

        which doesn’t really back me up.

        My downvote principle was meant more generally - most places that have a downvote policy say that it’s not meant for shouting down people you disagree with, since that’s not conducive for civil and nuanced conversations.

        • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I understand the point (especially if some can’t use downvotes) but I hope the alternative isn’t something like this post, because I don’t think I’ve ever seen a less civil one.

    • ggsu7@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Explain the downvotes for my “unrelated” comment which is apparently more unrelated than someone posting just “shut up”.