jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 11 months agoA Demographic Time Bomb Is About to Hit the Beef Industrywww.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1160arrow-down16cross-posted to: cooking@mander.xyzenvironment@beehaw.org
arrow-up1154arrow-down1external-linkA Demographic Time Bomb Is About to Hit the Beef Industrywww.wired.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square73fedilinkcross-posted to: cooking@mander.xyzenvironment@beehaw.org
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agothat’s not my ethical system. most people don’t subscribe to it.
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoRight, most people subscribe to their holy book(s) of choice
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoeven among professional philosophers the prevailing ethical system is deontology
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agosentientism is compatible with deontology
minus-squarespud@sh.itjust.workscakelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·10 months agoaccording to some, but kant never went in for it. the strongest attempt to marry them seems to be from korsgaard, but howe treated her argument pretty roughly in “why kant animals have rights” (2019)
that’s not my ethical system. most people don’t subscribe to it.
Right, most people subscribe to their holy book(s) of choice
even among professional philosophers the prevailing ethical system is deontology
sentientism is compatible with deontology
according to some, but kant never went in for it. the strongest attempt to marry them seems to be from korsgaard, but howe treated her argument pretty roughly in “why kant animals have rights” (2019)