I’m trying to set up a Linux laptop for a friend who lives in another city. They have only ever used Windows, and likely won’t have easy access to fix issues (not that I’m an expert).

First off, is it a good idea to give them a Linux PC at all? Have others had good/bad experiences giving technophobes Linux?

Secondly, if I go ahead with it, what’s a good, stable, “safe” OS for a beginner? I’m shy of anything that’s a rolling release (e.g. Arch, Manjaro etc) as “bleeding edge” can break things more often than not. I’m leaning towards Debian or something Debian based. But I’ve also heard good things about Fedora.

If I was the one using the PC, I’d have installed Fedora, as I’ve heard it’s well-maintained. Then again there’s been some good buzz about Debian 12. What would your advice be? Thanks!

  • rimu@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ubuntu or Mint are among the most noob-friendly.

    But probably the biggest impact will be whether you go with Gnome or KDE. KDE is more Windows-like so could be a softer landing.

    I’ve read a lot of stories where installing Linux resulted in less support calls, not more. It depends on how ambitious the user is - if they’re mostly just staying in their lane and browsing the web it should be rock solid.

    • TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I second this. If the thinkpad is very old and weak (like before core i? or celeron stuff) you may have a better luck with an XFCE-based distro. I installed MX Linux on an old laptop (2nd gen i7 mobile) and felt snappier than anything, quite stable, and simple to use for newbies. Otherwise, if it is not an ancient laptop, just follow the advice of /u/rimu@lemmy.nz

  • Wrongthink@cdrom.tokyo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    @piezoelectron

    First off, is it a good idea to give them a Linux PC at all? Have others had good/bad experiences giving technophobes Linux?

    Hi. I wrote a bit on the subject

    tl;dr: Don’t do it unless they specifically approach you about it and appear outwardly excited over the idea.

  • Andy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    For a no-nonsense working system familiar to Windows users, it’s hard to go wrong with Linux Mint, Cinnamon edition. If it really feels sluggish under that weight, maybe try out the Mate and XFCE editions, in turn.

  • zemonofdrako@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    1, It’s a good idea to give them Linux if they agreed to it and have a general understanding of what is different.

    2, I installed Debian on my 81 years old friend’s shitty old laptop (it was out of curiousity), he never called me back to fix his OS. For your friend though, I’d recommend Linux Mint Debian Edition, as it feels faster than regular Mint.

    • piezoelectron@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cheers! Yep, I’m gonna give them the down low on Linux. I might even modify the DE to imitate the Windows 11 UX so the transition is easier.

      I’m basically boiling it down to Debian/Debian-based OR Fedora…

      • zemonofdrako@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have no experience with Fedora, as far as I can tell mostly tech enthusiasts use it. I wouldn’t install a rolling distro on a newbie’s machine, though.

  • 翠星石@freesoftwareextremist.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    @piezoelectron It’s a bad idea to give someone a “Linux PC”, as that’ll just panic() on boot.

    You should be glad to give freedom to someone by giving them a GNU/Linux PC.

    Trisquel: https://trisquel.info/ is an excellent choice as it’s easy to use, note that some hardware will refuse to work (although that’s usually only really 802.11ac Wi-Fi cards and decent external or internal 802.11n ones are rather cheap).

    • Borgzilla@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think Triquel is one of the few 100% libre distros. They are becoming rarer and rarer.

    • soupuos@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it possible the rough edges of Trisquel would turn OP’s friend off of Linux as a whole?

      • 翠星石@freesoftwareextremist.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        @soupuos What rough edges?

        Some hardware and proprietary software are designed maliciously with sharp blades to cut the user, but that’s nothing to do with Trisquel.

        It would be good if people were to be turned off from the proprietary software kernel known as Linux and got to know GNU Linux-libre and/or Hurd instead.

        • soupuos@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I completely agree. But most people don’t see how significant free software is (e.g., OP’s friend is using Windows). If a libre system means a worse experience for the user, many won’t care enough to stick with it.

          Linux with proprietary software is at least a step in the right direction; I agree that it’s not the final destination though.

          • 翠星石@freesoftwareextremist.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            @soupuos >most people don’t see how significant free software is
            Indeed.

            >If a libre system means a worse experience for the user, many won’t care enough to stick with it.
            A libre system that respects the user is always a better experience for the user, although some inconveniences may exist (which are fixable with effort).

            It’s a real shame if people give up on freedom over a slight difficulty, but there’s nothing I can do about that really.

            >Linux with proprietary software is at least a step in the right direction; I agree that it’s not the final destination though.
            Maybe, but if only a single step is ever taken in the right direction, has more than a trivial gain been realized?

      • 翠星石@freesoftwareextremist.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @sallyNULL @piezoelectron Depends really.

        I found Trisquel works fine with even a card as new as the gtx 970 thanks to Nouveau, although the card is stuck at idle clocks as the fans refuse to spin without proprietary software that is cryptographically signed to prevent its replacement.

        Even newer AMD ones should work with a native resolution, but you won’t get 3D acceleration nor suspend.

        Integrated Intel still works just fine.

        • @Suiseiseki @piezoelectron > Even newer AMD ones should work with a native resolution, but you won’t get 3D acceleration nor suspend.

          From my personal experience, AMD GPUs from 2017 and newer do not have working 3D rendering support at all without nonfree blobs, only BIOS works, which means you’re stuck on tty at 800x600 resolution, I have no clue if Nvidia newer cards also have the same issue as I’ve not touched an Nvidia card since GTX 10 series nor I have plans on doing so, but I wouldn’t be surprised newer cards have the exact same issue.

  • humdrumgentleman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would suggest Linux Mint. It is aimed at beginners, has a desktop environment that is relatively similar to Windows, and is based on Ubuntu (and therefore Debian).